Next Article in Journal
Efficiently Supporting Online Privacy-Preserving Data Publishing in a Distributed Computing Environment
Next Article in Special Issue
Adverse Events Following COVID-19 Vaccine in Patients Previously Injected with Facial Filler: Scoping Review and Case Report
Previous Article in Journal
Cutting Force Prediction Model for Elliptical Vibration Cutting SiCp/Al Based on Three-Phase Friction Theory
Previous Article in Special Issue
Resective Surgery versus Debridement in Stage 2 Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Short-Facelift Approach in Temporal Artery Biopsy: Is It Safe?

1
Plastic Surgery Unit, Multidisciplinary Department of Medical Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Campania ‘Luigi Vanvitelli’, 80138 Naples, Italy
2
Division of Rheumatology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania ‘Luigi Vanvitelli’, 80138 Naples, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(22), 10739; https://doi.org/10.3390/app112210739
Submission received: 6 October 2021 / Revised: 31 October 2021 / Accepted: 10 November 2021 / Published: 14 November 2021

Abstract

:
Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a quite common panarteritis of the elderly that affects medium- and large-size arteries. Despite the increasing role of imaging with advancing technology, the gold standard for the diagnosis of GCA is still the temporal artery biopsy. A described complication of superficial temporal artery biopsy (STAB), for which incidence is not clear, is the accidental damage of the frontal branch of the facial nerve. In this paper, we described the short-scar facelift surgical approach for STAB on 23 consecutive patients who underwent unilateral superficial temporal artery biopsy for GCA suspicion. We collected data in terms of postoperative complications, biopsy specimen length, biopsy result and cosmetic appearance of the scar. In our experience, this surgical approach combines the advantage of avoiding incisions within the dangerous anatomical area, minimizing the risk of facial nerve damage, with an acceptable complication rate and a good final aesthetic result which avoids visible scarring.

1. Introduction

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a quite common panarteritis of the elderly that affects medium- and large-size arteries.
This type of vasculitis commonly involves the superficial temporal branches of the external carotid artery and the ophthalmic branch of the internal carotid artery.
GCA has its peak of incidence between 70 and 80 years and it is more common in females than in males, especially among the Northern European population [1].
There is still an open debate regarding pathogenesis of this clinical condition; regardless, all theories are in agreement in affirming that the immunopathology of GCA is due to an active immune response towards the vessel wall. The immune response involves T-cells and macrophages that infiltrate the boundary of the media and intima, leading to a granulomatous inflammation that promotes the formation of giant cells, and this is the reason why this vasculitis is named giant cell arteritis [2].
The classic symptoms are related to the local vascular damage resulting in vessel wall hyperplasia and arterial occlusion, and consist of headaches, jaw claudication, and visual impairments [3].
Other clinical manifestations of GCA are related to a systemic inflammatory status and consist of fever, malaise, polymyalgia rheumatica, anorexia, and weight loss.
The major clinical complication of GCA is blindness, which can only be prevented by an early detection and treatment [4].
Concerning physical examination, upon palpation, the superficial temporal artery can be increased in thickness, and become tender, erythematous, and with a decreased pulse.
Nevertheless, 50% of patients affected by GCA present normal physical findings on palpation of the superficial temporal artery.
The diagnostic algorithm also includes blood tests in order to determine erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP), which are non-specific markers of inflammation disease.
Despite the increasing role of imaging with advancing technology, the gold standard for the diagnosis of GCA is still the temporal artery biopsy [5].
The length of biopsy specimens varies from 2 cm to 3–5 cm in patients with and without signs of temporal arteritis, respectively [6].
Skip lesions are frequent in GCA, thus an adequate specimen is crucial in order to prevent missing the affected portion of the vessel and to avoid a false negative result.
A described complication of superficial temporal artery biopsy (STAB), for which incidence is not clear, is the accidental damage of the frontal branch of the facial nerve [7].
In every case of facial nerve impairment after STAB described in the literature, incisions were placed within the known course of the frontal branch of the facial nerve.
In this paper, we describe the short-scar facelift surgical approach for STAB and a case series study.

2. Materials

We retrospectively reviewed 23 consecutive patients, 19 females (82.6%) and 4 males (17.4%), who underwent unilateral superficial temporal artery biopsy for GCA suspicion.
The patients were aged between 72 and 84 years of age (mean 77.39), and 14 out of 23 (60.8%) presented clinical signs on palpation of the superficial temporal artery.
We collected data in terms of postoperative complications, biopsy specimen length, biopsy result, and cosmetic appearance of the scar.
Regarding the quality of the scar, we used a visual analog scale (VAS) with a score between 0 and 5, where 0 represents the worst cosmetic appearance and 5 represents the best cosmetic appearance at six months after the surgical procedure.

3. Methods

The short-scar facelift incision starts from the retrotragal region and reaches the sideburn area. (Figure 1)
Local anesthesia with 1% Mepivacaine is injected into and beneath the overlying skin.
The skin incision is performed with a n. 15 blade and deepened until the subdermal fat is encountered, and then the skin flap is dissected with a double prong hook retractor and Rees Scissor above the superficial muscle aponeurotic system (SMAS) for 2–3 cm.
Once the SMAS has been exposed, this fascial plane is incised 1–2 cm in front of the tragus and the incision is extended superiorly for 3–5 cm in order to harvest a conjoined fascial flap of SMAS and pretemporal fascia.
Then, the harvested conjoined fascial flap is anteriorly dissected for 1–2 cm and reflected with a Weitlaner blunt self-retaining retractor.
At this point, the superficial temporal artery comes into view and can be dissected easily from the vein up to its superior bifurcation. (Figure 2)
Collateral and adjacent vessels are ligated and cut until an adequate length of the specimen is reached, then the artery can be harvested and measured with a sterile ruler.
Accurate hemostasis is obtained with bipolar forceps and the skin closure is performed with 5/0 nylon interrupted sutures.
Dressing changes occur every 2 days and stitches are removed 7–10 day postoperative. (Figure 3).

4. Results

The mean length of the collected sample was 2.60 cm and 17 of the 23 biopsies (73.91%) came back positive for GCA.
In terms of aesthetic result, the finding of an average value of 4.04 at six months postoperative with the VAS scale demonstrated a good long-term aesthetic outcome. (Table 1)
In terms of postoperative complications, no injury to facial nerve was registered. (Table 2).

5. Discussion

According to the American College of Rheumatology, the diagnosis of GCA requires at least three of the following five criteria: age > 50 years, new-onset localized headache, temporal artery tenderness, ESR > 50 mm/h and a positive result of temporal artery biopsy (TAB) [8].
Nevertheless, a positive temporal artery biopsy still represents the gold standard in the diagnosis of GCA.
The debate about how and when to sample the artery is still open: giant cell arteritis often causes a patchy inflammatory status leading to so-called skip lesions. Due to this pathological pattern, evaluation of short artery specimens may miss the affected areas, leading to false negative results [9,10].
Furthermore, the temporal artery biopsy procedure is not complication free: in fact, the close proximity between artery and frontal branch of the facial nerve puts the patient at risk of facial palsy.
This complication has been reported in the literature mainly as case series articles, and most of them described biopsies taken in the frontal area.
Damage to the frontal branch of the facial nerve can cause paralysis with drooping of the eyebrow, loss of eyebrow elevation, and loss of eyelid closure with varying recovery rates [11].
In 2012, Murchinson et al. [12] published a prospective analysis of 75 temporal artery biopsies discovering that there is a 16.0% incidence of postoperative frontal branch of facial nerve damage, which fully recovers in over half of the patients. Furthermore, they found that incisions closer to the orbital rim and eyebrow were more likely to have facial nerve damage, supporting the description of an anatomical danger zone in which surgical incisions for TAB should be strongly discouraged [7,13].
In order to avoid incisions in the danger zone, alternative surgical approaches for TBA have been proposed both at the scalp level [14,15] and at the level of the preauricular wrinkle crease [16].
In 2019, Czyz et al. [17] conducted a retrospective study on 137 temporal artery biopsies with incisions at the level of the temporal hairline without injury to the facial nerve.
Facelift incision has been extensively described for cancer interventions such as parotidectomy and neck dissection as it results in cosmetically improved outcomes [18,19,20].
In this article, we have described the use of a short-facelift incision in temporal artery biopsy; this surgical approach combines the advantage of avoiding incisions within the dangerous anatomical area, minimizing the risk of facial nerve damage, with an acceptable complication rate and a good final aesthetic result that avoids visible scarring.
A possible limitation could be represented by the fact that our case series is smaller than the previous works described, but the data we have collected are encouraging.
Finally, it can be of great help for trainees to become familiar with the cosmetic facelift surgical procedure.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: M.F. (Mario Faenza) and F.C. Methodology: G.P. Validation: I.P. Investigation: R.G. Data curation: M.F. (Mariano Funaro). Writing—original draft preparation: M.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study, due to the fact that it is not an experimental study.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

Data Availability Statement

Plastic Surgery Unit, Multidisciplinary Department of Medical Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Campania ‘Luigi Vanvitelli’, Piazza Luigi Miraglia,2, 80138, Naples, Italy phone number: 0039 0815664072.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Borchers, A.T.; Gershwin, M.E. Giant cell arteritis: A review of classification, pathophysiology, geoepidemiology and treatment. Autoimmun. Rev. 2012, 11, A544–A554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Salvarani, C.; Cantini, F.; Hunder, G.G. Polymyalgia rheumatica and giant-cell arteritis. Lancet 2008, 372, 234–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Harder, N. Temporal arteritis: An approach to suspected vasculitides. Prim. Care 2010, 37, 757–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Epperly, T.D.; Moore, K.E.; Harrover, J.D. Polymyalgia rheumatica and temporal arthritis. Am. Fam. Phys. 2000, 62, 789–796. [Google Scholar]
  5. Meskimen, S.; Cook, T.D.; Blake, R.L., Jr. Management of giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatic. Am. Fam. Phys. 2000, 61, 2061–2068. [Google Scholar]
  6. Schallhorn, J.; Haug, S.J.; Yoon, M.K.; Porco, T.; Seiff, S.R.; McCulley, T.J. A national survey of practice patterns: Temporal artery biopsy. Ophthalmology 2013, 120, 1930–1934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Gunawardene, A.R.; Chant, H. Facial nerve injury during temporal artery biopsy. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 2014, 96, 257–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Hunder, G.G.; Bloch, D.A.; Michel, B.A.; Stevens, M.B.; Arend, W.P.; Calabrese, L.H.; Edworthy, S.M.; Fauci, A.S.; Leavitt, R.Y.; Lie, J.T.; et al. The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of giant cell arteritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 1990, 33, 1122–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Albert, D.M.; Ruchman, M.C.; Keltner, J.L. Skip areas in temporal arteritis. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1976, 94, 2072–2077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Stacy, R.C.; Rizzo, J.F.; Cestari, D.M. Subtleties in the histopathology of giant cell arteritis. Semin. Ophthalmol. 2011, 26, 342–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Yoon, M.K.; Horton, J.C.; McCulley, T.J. Facial nerve injury: A complication of superficial temporal artery biopsy. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2011, 152, 251–255.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Murchison, A.P.; Bilyk, J.R. Brow ptosis after temporal artery biopsy: Incidence and associations. Ophthalmology 2012, 119, 2637–2642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Colella, G.; Rauso, R.; Tartaro, G.; Biondi, P. Skin injury and great auricular nerve sacrifice after parotidectomy. J. Craniofac. Surg. 2009, 20, 1078–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Markose, G.; Graham, R.M. Gillies temporal incision: An alternate approach to superficial temporal artery biopsy. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2017, 55, 719–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Conde-Ferreirós, A.; Fraile-Alonso, M.D.C.; Román-Curto, C. “Book Flap” Approach for Temporal Artery Biopsy. Dermatol. Surg. 2020, 46, 1361–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Charlesworth, P. Regarding temporal artery biopsy technique. Dermatol. Surg. 2001, 27, 608. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Czyz, C.N.; Allen, J.B.; Cahill, K.V.; Nabavi, C.B.; Foster, J.A. Effects of incision location on specimen quality and complications for temporal artery biopsy. Vascular 2019, 27, 347–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Grover, N.; D’Souza, A. Facelift approach for parotidectomy: An evolving aesthetic technique. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2013, 148, 548–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Melvin, T.A.; Eliades, S.J.; Ha, P.K.; Fakhry, C.; Saunders, J.M.; Califano, J.A.; Blanco, R.G. Neck dissection through a facelift incision. Laryngoscope 2012, 122, 2700–2706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Tae, K.; Ji, Y.B.; Song, C.M.; Sung, E.S.; Chung, J.H.; Lee, S.H.; Park, H.J. Feasibility of robot-assisted modified radical neck dissection by post-auricular facelift approach. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2016, 45, 1351–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Preoperative markings of the short-scar facelift incision.
Figure 1. Preoperative markings of the short-scar facelift incision.
Applsci 11 10739 g001
Figure 2. Intraoperative view of the dissected temporal artery.
Figure 2. Intraoperative view of the dissected temporal artery.
Applsci 11 10739 g002
Figure 3. Preoperative and postoperative view.
Figure 3. Preoperative and postoperative view.
Applsci 11 10739 g003
Table 1. Postoperative Results.
Table 1. Postoperative Results.
ParametersResults (Mean)
Length of specimen (cm)2.60 cm
Pathology Report (%)73.91 % positive for GCA
Scar quality (VAS)4.04
Table 2. Postoperative Complications Results.
Table 2. Postoperative Complications Results.
Postoperative ComplicationsResults (Mean)
Hematoma2 (8.69%)
Infection1 (4.34%)
Partial Wound Dehiscence2 (8.69%)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Faenza, M.; Piccolo, G.; Funaro, M.; Grella, R.; Pantano, I.; Ciccia, F. Short-Facelift Approach in Temporal Artery Biopsy: Is It Safe? Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 10739. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112210739

AMA Style

Faenza M, Piccolo G, Funaro M, Grella R, Pantano I, Ciccia F. Short-Facelift Approach in Temporal Artery Biopsy: Is It Safe? Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(22):10739. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112210739

Chicago/Turabian Style

Faenza, Mario, Giuseppina Piccolo, Mariano Funaro, Roberto Grella, Ilenia Pantano, and Francesco Ciccia. 2021. "Short-Facelift Approach in Temporal Artery Biopsy: Is It Safe?" Applied Sciences 11, no. 22: 10739. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112210739

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop