The Queen Mum's Jag: PH Blog
Scrof takes the Queen Mother's old XJ12 for a spin
The first came back in March when, having just watched Andy Wallace pulling some big speeds in an F-Type, Jaguar’s people asked if I wanted to jump in the passenger seat of a D-Type with him for a two-hour schlep across northern France. I was there like a shot. 'Shot' being a relative term, bearing in mind the contortion required to get myself seated and strapped in. Totally worth it, though.
Another opportunity with one of Jaguar’s Heritage cars yesterday, this time behind the wheel. A long-wheelbase, Series One XJ12, to be precise, finished in deep red, or Royal Claret, to give the colour its exact name. A name, perhaps surprisingly, free of hyperbole, because this particular XJ was once owned by Queen Elizabeth, the Queen Mother.
It was built and delivered to Her Majesty in 1973, and once its time with her was over the XJ12 was retired to the Heritage collection, alongside several other Jaguars and Daimlers once used or owned by the Queen Mother. Fitted with Jaguar’s iconic 5.3-litre V12 engine, it kicked out 269hp when new, and was once, Jaguar claimed, the fastest full four-seater in the world, with a top speed of over 140mph.
It bears the marks of its former owner, too, the leaper absent, and the flag that once stood in its place replaced by two rubber bungs covering the holes. And it’s not just special because of its royal patronage, either; this XJ also has the honour of being the first ever long-wheelbase example to be produced. Apparently Jag built it as a one-off for the Queen Mum, but then came over all “hang on a minute lads – I’ve got an idea...” – and before you knew it, the production LWB was born.
What’s it like, then? Well, you know what you’re thinking it’ll be like? Yeah. That. Open the door and you drop into a seat set low; the driving position rakish, almost coupe-like, and miles removed from today’s taller limousines. The dash, meanwhile, is that solid slab of pure timber, edged in padded leather, that no Jaguar of its day would be seen in public without. Crank the engine and it simply clicks into life. Into D and the big V12 swells beneath you, and you’re off, seamlessly. Acceleration is muted, but the XJ does a sterling job of gathering speed whenever required, the kickdown giving an extra bit of punch to spur the old girl up hills. Corners are dealt with sedately, meanwhile. The sense that the spindly Bakelite steering wheel is attached to the front wheels by means of little more than cotton wool and hope sees to that, but the result is that progress is never so fast that it becomes ungainly. And beneath it all, that lacquer-smooth V12 rumbles and purrs softly to itself, murmuring happily each time you prod the throttle.
It’s utterly graceful; composed and elegant, without being ostentatious, and still more refined than many a modern car. A vehicle that perfectly befits a royal, in other words. And while its provenance makes it unique, even without that it'd still be a very special thing in its own right. It’s easy to see now why the XJ caused such a stir when it first arrived. And sitting behind the wheel of this one, I don't doubt Her Majesty must have felt rather proud of what her nation could produce.
Alex
Sitting waiting for my MoT the other day and saw a recent edition of Octane magazine had a comparison of the two. Left me thinking that I really couldn't make up my mind which I would prefer, so decided that my EuroLotto winning garage would have them both.
The first old car magazine I ever bought was a Classic and Sportscar from about 1983 and it had a comparison between a SWB XJ12 and the Merc 6.3. I seem to recall that, as expected, the Merc had the slight edge on power but couldn't get near the Jaguar on noise level, refinement and handling. Being built like a brick outhouse isn't everything.
When 'Car' said on the launch of the XJ6 that they no longer had to be jealous of the guy in the big white Merc they were right.
The weakness of the early v12s, IIRC, was not the mechanicals but the new fangled computer chips used in the ECU. They couldn`t stand the heat under the hood and failed causing sudden, involuntary stops and many irate owners. Later the computer chips were hardened so they could withstand the heat in the kitchen.
The weakness of the early v12s, IIRC, was not the mechanicals but the new fangled computer chips used in the ECU. They couldn`t stand the heat under the hood and failed causing sudden, involuntary stops and many irate owners. Later the computer chips were hardened so they could withstand the heat in the kitchen.
(I'll get my coat.)
The weakness of the early v12s, IIRC, was not the mechanicals but the new fangled computer chips used in the ECU. They couldn`t stand the heat under the hood and failed causing sudden, involuntary stops and many irate owners. Later the computer chips were hardened so they could withstand the heat in the kitchen.
I have seen the youtube video. I believe lots of the decisions they made were cost driven and far from ideal. The cylinder head design in particular was pretty poor, so much so that it was changed in 81(?) for the HE head. The inlet manifolding is waaayyyy to long on carb cars, obviously the engine was designed for fuel injection, it also has too much space between cylinders and holds too much water so takes an age to warm up. I also think the short stroke/big bore design isn't ideal for the cars it was put into. It needs to rev to produce the power but the top end breathing is too restrictive and won't allow it. I bet Harry et el knew all this when they filmed the video. On the plus side it has been proven to be reliable.
Don't get me wrong, having owned a V12 XJ-S and hoping to buy an XJ12 I love the engine but I'm not blind to the fact that it is not a great design...however an OK V12 is still a V12...
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff