Rare Rides: The 1984 Chevrolet Camaro Berlinetta, a Sports Car for Luxurious People

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

The last (and only) time Rare Rides covered a Camaro, it was a heavily altered Callaway SuperNatural from the Nineties. While that Camaro was all about performance, today’s Camaro takes a different tack.

It’s a Berlinetta, the Cadillac of Camaros (probably).

General Motors stuck with its second generation Camaro for quite some time, stretching the life of its sub-Corvette sports car from 1970 to 1981. During that time, the Camaro was fettled and updated, and made consistently uglier until it was past due for replacement. Enter another F-body!

New for 1982, the Camaro and its Firebird sibling continued in the F-body tradition. GM went with a major redesign for the Eighties, and focused on bringing the exterior design up to date for both models. There were also efforts to add lightness to the platform for the sake of handling, and curb weight for the third gen Camaro dropped by about 300 pounds, to 3,086 for the lightest versions.

Other important changes for the new, modern Camaro included a hatchback where a trunk was found previously, available fuel injection, and a four-cylinder engine. Speaking of power, engines ranged in displacement from 2.5 to 5.7 liters. There was a singular 2.5-liter I-4, three different V6 mills depending on model year, and two different V8s. The smaller V8 was a 5.0-liter (305), with a 5.7 (350) at the top of the range. Transmissions were three- or four-speed if automatic, and four- or five-speeds if manual.

Carried over from its 1979 introduction on the old Camaro was the Berlinetta trim. A luxury specification, its base engine was a 2.8-liter V6, though spendy fancy people opted for the 5.0 instead. Exterior features found only on Berlinetta included the gold Berlinetta badges, headlamp insets painted in a contrast color to the body, and a unique finned alloy wheel design with gold tone and Berlinetta center caps. Gold effects continued at the rear, with a glistening horizontal trim bar across the lamp assembly.

Inside, there was an upscale cloth interior of high style, more Berlinetta badges, a complete instrument package as standard, carpeted rear wheel arches, and a storage well cover for parcels and your choice of monogrammed beige luggage. Unseen by consumers was additional sound insulation, for a more serene ride.

Luxury Camaro customers would have to move on from Camaro after 1986, as GM saw fit to replace Berlinetta with LT for 1987. This change coincided with the closure of the Norwood, Ohio plant, and left production solely at Van Nuys, California. The third-generation Camaro lived on through the model year 1992 before its replacement by the swoopy fourth-gen seen at the link above.

Today’s Rare Ride Berlinetta is an absolute peach in beige, gold, brown, and tan with stripes. With the 2.8 V6, an automatic, and 22,000 miles, it asks $12,900 in Ohio.

[Images: seller]

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 52 comments
  • DenverMike DenverMike on Nov 08, 2020

    Yes the price is crack pipe, but after the Coyote swap... oh yeah there's the base brakes/suspension/steering/body/wheels/etc. Might as well start with the IROCz. It's 2X the money maybe, but 4 or 5X the car.

  • Speedlaw Speedlaw on Nov 09, 2020

    When these were new, they were the joke car that an over coiffed wife of a prosperous local merchant would buy, or a secretary with her first job (in an economy where that job paid enough). Pass. Period. Not even a decent example...the 2.8 with an automatic ? Even back in the day there were a hundred better choices.

  • Steve Jacobs I've got a bright Red Kia EV6. Easy to find in a parking lot.
  • MKizzy Gently used EV6's under $30K aren't hard to find and have the range and style to almost intrigue me into taking the EV plunge. However, I'll wait for a mid-sized non-luxury EV sedan or wagon which is not a tablet housing a car (Model 3) or sacrifices too much usable space for the sake of style (Ioniq 6) before I go electric. I'm not holding my breath.
  • Arthur Dailey Am currently comparing both vehicles. Some issues not addressed in the article 1) the wait times for most RAV4's are currently considerably longer, 2) RAV4's are among the most stolen vehicles in my area (the GTA), 3) Mazda has a superior warranty. Manufacturing locations are perhaps a toss up. For the majority of these vehicles sold in the Canadian market from what I can ascertain, CX-5's are manufactured in Japan, and RAV4's in Alliston Ontario. One area where I will disagree with Matt is in the upholstery. I far prefer cloth to leather. With grandchildren and a dog, there is far more chance that the leather will be cut or scratched. And leather, particularly in black is too hot in the summer and very cold when you first sit on it during a Canadian winter. Cloth is the winner in that competition, but still an inferior choice to rich 1970's style velour upholstery.
  • Eliyahu I've had my 2018 CX-5 FWD top trim for about 18 months. It is fun to drive and a nice design. Mazda really did a great job of making the most out of the platform when they did the design refresh. The driver's seat, however, is overly firm and perhaps a tad too small. I have also come to appreciate the open feeling of the Forester compared to the well-organized but more closed in cockpit of the CX-5. A minor quibble would be the smallish gas tank. Overall, a very nice design.
  • Redapple2 CX5. Rented one 2 yr ago. ~2000miles. Issues. 1 Thumbwheel controller not good. 2. Sweeping curve on the interstate passing a car, the automatic braking picked up a car in the lane over. Beeps and slight braking. Not drop anchor mode, but still head scratching. But it looks so dam good. Wonderful still after many years. CX5 all the way!!!
Next