Going it Alone

Recalling Dacia’s home-grown supermini.

Image: autoevolution.com

Since its takeover by Groupe Renault in 1999, the Romanian automaker Dacia really has flourished. Using proven but not outdated technology provided by its parent, Dacia has produced an interesting range of practical and unflashy cars that offer excellent value and meet the needs of their owners perfectly(1). The typical Dacia driver tends to be someone who regards a motor vehicle as a useful appliance rather than a status symbol. That said, there is almost an inverted snobbery to owning a Dacia these days that says, “I’m too smart to pay up for a fashionable badge.”

Renault’s association with Dacia goes back all the way to 1966. On 6th September of that year in Bucharest, a framework contract between the Romanian Government and the Régie Nationale des Usines Renault was signed for an initial period of ten years whereby Dacia would build Renault cars under licence. Production started with the rear-engined Renault 8 in August 1968, which was sold under the name Dacia 1100 until 1971. This was supplemented in 1969 with the Dacia 1300, a Romanian version of the front-engined FWD Renault 12. It is this car that would form the core of the Dacia range for the following thirty-five years, when it was finally replaced by the Renault-designed Logan saloon.

What is rather less well known is that Dacia harboured ambitions to produce its own in-house designed car and began working on one in the mid-1980s(2). Because of financial constraints and the upheaval in Eastern Europe surrounding the collapse of the Soviet Union in December 1991, the new Dacia would not reach production until 1995. It was called the Nova(3) and was a transverse-engined FWD B-segment five-door hatchback with more than a passing resemblance to the 1981 Renault 11 and, to a lesser extent, the 1985 Peugeot 309, thanks to its curvaceous rear windscreen.

Image: forum.b-zone.ro

The front end was a dead-ringer for the 1983 Alfa Romeo 33, minus the Scudetto, of course. The Nova stood on a wheelbase of 2,475mm (97½”) and had an overall length of 4,030mm (158¾”). The former was pretty much the class average for contemporary superminis, but the bustle tail made it around 300mm (11¾”) longer than the norm. it was commendably light at just 940kg (2,072lbs).

Image: renaultgroup.com

The Nova’s 1980s design references meant that it was rather outdated looking by the mid-1990s, when curvy organic designs were very much in fashion. Its engine was also rather geriatric, being the Renault Cléon overhead-valve unit that dated all the way back to 1962. In the Nova, it was offered in 1,397cc and 1,557cc capacities, producing maximum power of 62bhp (46kW) and 72bhp (54kW) respectively. These were mated to a five-speed gearbox designed in-house by Dacia. Claimed top speeds were 150km/h (93mph) and 160km/h (99mph) and the Nova was liked for its lively performance and good roadholding.

However, Dacia’s inexperience soon began to reveal itself in build quality and reliability that was inferior to the Renault 12-based car, now badged Dacia 1310. Early examples also suffered from premature corrosion. A relaunch was ordered for 1996 with a facelift that included shallower, more curvaceous headlamps and a slimmer front grille in an attempt to give it a more contemporary appearance.

Image: promotor.ro

Later, and rather strangely, the heavily curved rear screen was supplemented by an almost flat alternative that gave the car a rather different side profile. Perhaps the intention was to make it more saloon-like in appearance, to appeal to conservative local market tastes? The two versions appear to have been marketed alongside each other before the original was dropped.

Image: petrolblog.com

The Nova remained on the market for five years. Towards the end of its life, Renault completed its takeover of Dacia(4) and began development of a new small saloon that would be launched as the Logan in 2004. In the meantime, Dacia needed a stop-gap model, and the Nova was re-engineered to accept the 1,390cc 75bhp (56kW) SOHC engine and five-speed manual gearbox from the Renault Clio. Equipment levels were improved to include air-conditioning, electric windows and alloy wheels on more upmarket versions, but the external appearance was pretty much unchanged. The car was renamed SupeRNova(5).

Image: wawawoom.com

In 2003, the SupeRNova was facelifted to become the Solenza and received new front and rear-end treatments. At the front, the Solenza featured new trapezoidal shaped headlamps and a ‘V’ shaped grille that anticipated the style for the forthcoming Logan. At the rear, smaller triangular tail lights replaced the rectangular originals, allowing for a wider boot opening. Mechanically, the only significant change was the addition of a 1,870cc 63bhp (47kW) diesel engine. The Solenza had a short lifespan of just over two years before it was discontinued shortly after the Logan was launched. The rest is, of course, history.

(1) The sort of cars Škoda produced in the early 21st Century before the Czech marque was neutered by its jealous parent.

(2) Dacia did also launch a fibreglass-bodied city car called the Lastun in 1988. It was dreadful and was soon shunned by buyers and discontinued.

(3) A model name for which General Motors held the copyright, surely?

(4) Initially purchasing a controlling 51% stake, later increased to 99%.

(5) The apparently random capitalisation is correct. Perhaps it was a reference to Renault?

Author: Daniel O'Callaghan

Shut-line obsessive...Hates rudeness, loves biscuits.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

20 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Geo Pannonia Chimor Angulema Amargo
Geo Pannonia Chimor Angulema Amargo
9 October 2023 07:39

Strange car, never knew it existed. When I saw the second picture I thought it was a pressed-together Fiat Croma.

Freerk de Ruiter
Freerk de Ruiter
Reply to  Geo Pannonia Chimor Angulema Amargo
9 October 2023 07:52

Same here. I’m getting the Croma vibes too.

Tom V
Tom V
Reply to  Geo Pannonia Chimor Angulema Amargo
9 October 2023 09:59

Yup, definite Croma vibes. And a bit of Renault 14 in the original’s frontal aspect.

Thanks for the insight into an automotive curiosity, Daniel. From today’s platform sharing perspective it’s interesting to see how an automaker tried to go its own way. Before getting swallowed up and becoming a platform sharer itself, albeit probably one of the most accomplished ones in terms of the value they squeeze from the components. Wasn’t the Dacia 1300 originally brought to market just before the Renault 12?

Bob
Bob
9 October 2023 11:20

Dacia before the Renault takeover were also looking at the D33 project by IDEA.
comment image

Still mystified as to exactly what car the Nova was reversed-engineered from, based on seeing arguments of it boiling down to either the Renault 11/9 or Peugeot 309. The preceding Star prototype was said to have been developed from the basis of the Dacia 1410 Phase 3.
http://renaultconcepts.online.fr/dacia/nova/nova-prototypes.htm

Dacia were looking at a smaller before the Lastun, the 1000 Compact could have been better executed while Dacia’s pre and post Lastun city car ideas had they been taken together could have been less of a joke. A

http://renaultconcepts.online.fr/dacia/1310/1310protos1.htm

http://renaultconcepts.online.fr/dacia/petites/petites.htm

Alexander Moore
Alexander Moore
Reply to  Bob
13 October 2023 05:12

That I.DE.A proposal is fascinating. I’ve seen it elsewhere before, but every time I am brought back to how comforting and easy-on-the-eyes their curvaceous late ’90s compact saloons were. The Palio is a great example that made it to production, and I actually see a lot of this D33 prototype in the Nubira they did for Daewoo. There are some influences of it as well in their first-gen Kia Rio. A shame that I.DE.A is now gone, I quite liked their work and they always seemed rather enigmatic compared to the ‘big name’ houses.

richard herriott
Reply to  Bob
13 October 2023 18:07

Ì haven´t seen one of those before. It´s a bit Palio. The ovals are a little uncomfortable – just a bit of squareness could have given them definition.

richard herriott
Reply to  Bob
13 October 2023 18:11

Agreed: IDEA seemed to plough their own furrow. It was individual without being idiosyncratic. The Fiat group cars stand out and, of course, there´s the Lancia Kappa in the portfolio. I will look afresh at the Kia Rio now I know it´s an IDEA car. You´d have thought that the welter of brands launched in the far east would have given these minnow companies a bit of something to feed on. There´s more not less design work out there than in 2000. Something else killed them off. It wasn´t a lack of brands to design for.

Bob
Bob
Reply to  Bob
13 October 2023 20:47

Original image of the Dacia D33 prototype was from RenaultConcepts with auto translate giving impression of it being a rebodied Nova, found more at Car Design Archives.

https://www.facebook.com/cardesignarchives/posts/511591822542492

Automotive American
9 October 2023 12:25

I worked for Zastava GB back in the day and we used to also import the Dacia Duster, interesting vehicle, when it was running 😀 https://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/anything-goes-throwback-thursday/1985-dacia-duster-road-test-throwback-thursday

b234r
Reply to  Automotive American
9 October 2023 21:26

I remember the Duster was imported in Spain from 1986, it was called “Aro Dacia”, and while it wasn’t bad looking and the price was very competitive (with the Suzuki Santana 410 and the Lada Niva), the press said fit and finish was very bad.
My father has always loved a bargain and around 1989 we went to see the Dacia in a “showroom” (note the quotes), as he thought it was a good idea to buy a Dacia/Niva as a kind of small van for the family business. After taking a look at it (and the Niva), we went to the Renault dealer and ordered a Express. Good call.

S.V. Robinson
9 October 2023 12:40

It is notable the extent to which the last iteration of this car was designed to resemble the Logan – when I saw the images in the article, I assumed the cars shown were the Logan.

Was the Logan fully a Renault design or was it lifted from previously developed wok within Dacia?

Alexander Moore
Alexander Moore
Reply to  S.V. Robinson
13 October 2023 05:17

You’d have to ask PlQ on that one, it sounds like he worked quite closely on the Logan project from what I read in his book.

Giovanni
Giovanni
9 October 2023 13:57

No need to press the Croma. It’s a Fiat Duna! 😀

Robertas Parazitas
9 October 2023 14:11

I’m wondering where that end on gearbox came from, if not Renault.

BL / ARG / Rover never made their own; designed at least two, which were at least proof of concept that they would be better going to someone who knew what they were doing.

And as for the first Renault 12 to market? I’d say the Ford Corcel c.1968.

Peter Wilding
Peter Wilding
9 October 2023 22:25

Good evening all. This was a model I’d never heard of. The DLO seems unfortunately upright but that would make rear seat access easy. There seems to be a fine line between a successful rectilinear design and one that is less so.
The rear hatch of the original puts me in mind of the (larger, curvier, later) Nissan Pulsar N14, another design from Nissan’s Golden Age.
comment image

Konstantinos Tzoannopoulos
10 October 2023 11:44

Hi Daniel, thanks for this informative article on this curious and interesting little car. To me, it seems like it combines elements of the old R12-based offering, the Alfa 33 (as was mentioned), and – yes – the Croma and even the Uno. Pity they didn’t have the resources to hire a specialist design studio to come up with a more accomplished shape. However, it’s still an interesting piece of history, and it’s indeed a car designed with the needs and economic means of the Romanian people in mind.

20
0
Please comment.x
()
x