MenuClose
In This Article
Category: Magazine

Anybody who trudged through the 1970s will be able to recount the same-old, same-old: the fuel crisis, the crumbling domestic automotive market, the progressive invasion of the economy imports--all things we've heard and seen in print an infinite number of times. Looking back, though, there will surely be people--whose numbers are already growing--who will contradict the common stance regarding the American iron that left the Detroit assembly lines.

People still have a fondness in their hearts for these sultans of the Seventies, especially now that they have achieved the antique status that the rolling 25-year "rule" allows. Of the hundreds of thousands of mid-size personal-luxury cars that were built, Chevrolet's Monte Carlo reigned supreme; yet their attending numbers at car shows are slim. There are a number of explanations, including rust and the prolific demand of circle track competitors (at one time) and demo derby daredevils alike.

Chevrolet offered the Monte Carlo in two different models: the regular S or Landau. Combined, their 1976 production total was 353,272 units, all of which were equipped with some form of a V-8. Our feature car, owned by California resident Chris Green, has the 165hp version of the 350-cu.in. small-block bolted to the frame--an engine that was only available in California. The overall engine specification includes a 4.00 x 3.48-inch bore and stroke, 8.5:1 compression ratio, five mains and hydraulic lifters. A four-barrel carburetor sits atop the intake manifold, and the torque rating is 260-lbs.ft.

The base offering was a 140hp 305, and options included a two barrel-equipped, 145hp 350, and a 400-cu.in. engine that, topped with a four-barrel, cranked out 175hp. (Can you stand the excitement?) Chevy dropped the 454 from the Monte Carlo order sheet after the 1975 model year; after all, since when did a mid-size luxury car need any extra horses, anyway?

Since engine options were few, why complicate things with a number of transmission offerings? As with all Montes, GM inserted the three-speed Turbo Hydra-Matic automatic, although it could be shifted manually as well. If a buyer preferred a bench or split-bench interior, the shift lever was mounted on the column; if swivel bucket seats were ordered, a center console would also house the shift lever.

Exterior modification from the previous year included the use of stacked headlamps (replacing the single, circular lamps), slightly redesigned taillamps and a fresh grille. The use of body "bulges" in the front fenders and aft of the doors continued, although they were slightly more angular at the leading edges than in previous years. The electrically operated Sky Roof was an option, and sport mirrors added a touch of pizazz.

The 116-inch wheelbase was supported by a Radial-Tuned Full-Coil suspension featuring springs computer-selected to the car's weight, along with modified shock absorbers and front and rear stabilizer bars. Stopping the full-framed leviathan was a snap, thanks to the standard-equipment power front disc brakes that Chevrolet advertised as "Fade resistant, self-adjusting and with audible wear sensors that tell you when it's time to change the linings"--a good thing considering the near 4,000-pound curb weight.

Now that the Monte is 31 years of age, the real question is, will it ever be as collectible as the slightly older first generation of the fabled coupe?

Recent
What Happened When Mitchell Motor Car Company's Design Was Too Advanced
Images from Pat Foster's collection

There's an old saying in the automobile business: You never want to be too far behind styling trends, or too far ahead. Finding that sweet spot between styling that’s too conservative and too advanced is critical, and the Mitchell automobile is a good example of what can happen when a design is too far ahead of trends.

In 1919 the Mitchell Motor Company of Racine, Wisconsin, was considered a veteran automaker. It had begun producing motorcars in 1903, one year after Rambler and the same year as Ford Motor Company. Mitchell was profitable, a picture of success and prosperity, yet five years later the company was out of business and its plant sold to another carmaker. It proved a cautionary tale for other automobile companies.

Keep reading...Show Less
This Dual-Quad 1964 Buick Riviera Is Seeing Daylight After Thirty Years
Photography by Scotty Lachenauer

If there’s one thing we’ve learned about automotive barn finds, such discoveries are not always the cut-and-dry variety. You know, the classic image of some rarity being pulled from a structure so dilapidated any hint of wind might bring it crashing down. There are the well-used, truly original vehicles that have spent the static hours of existence in dusty, century-old abodes, handed from one family member to the next. Some barn finds were never really lost, rather just left to languish under the auspice of an idyllic restoration that never seems to happen. And then there are barn finds that have a habit of migrating home.

A case study is this 1964 Buick Riviera. It’s never really been lost, technically contradicting “find,” yet its decades-long dormancy in more than one storage facility, and with more than one owner, makes this first-gen GM E-body a prime barn find candidate. More so when the car’s known history, and relative desirability, can be recited with ease by current owner Tim Lynch.

Keep reading...Show Less

Trending