Swift Justice - 1926 Studebaker ''Sheriff'' Duplex Phaeton
The five-passenger 1926 Studebaker ''Sheriff'' Duplex Phaeton was a favorite of desert law enforcement, but may very well be the first muscle car
09/23/2018
May we agree that a muscle car is not just a performance car, but a car that possesses a full-size-car engine in a mid-size body and chassis? If we can adopt Benjamin Disraeli's approach, where the idea of an agreeable person is someone who agrees with me, then we can also stroll back through the calendar and gather examples; quickly, we understand that the muscle car was not a 1960s concept at all.
The 1964 GTO popularized the movement, but is often wrongly credited as its genesis. The new-for-1962 full-size Dodges and Plymouths were about the size of GM's intermediates, and sported 413 cubic inches of wedge-headed grunt, but we must go back further still to find the origin of the species. The 1957 Rambler Rebel? Keep moving. The 1955 Chrysler 300? Sorry, it's full-size. The Kettering-fettled 1949 Olds 98, combining a 76-series body with the hot new OHV V-8 engine from the 98 series? Post-war, yes, but there are older examples. The 1936 Buick Century, named despite its 95-MPH top speed (the faster '37 models were more correctly named), also fits the bill here. But there is another car that dates back to at least a decade before the Buick--one nearly lost to the mists of time and Old West lore.
Over all that time, muscle cars and the police cars that chased them were like the snakes of the caduceus, paths intertwining but (with luck) not connecting, parallel but from opposite sides of the tracks. These separate-but-equal, separated-at-birth machines often shared components; the original Oldsmobile 4-4-2 famously used its police-tuned chassis and suspension package with regular-production engines hot enough to scald tires and scofflaws alike, while Chrysler made no secret of dropping 360- and 440-cu.in. police interceptor V-8s into Coronets and Belvederes and the like. At the end of the last century, the only real difference between a police Caprice and its performance-oriented Impala SS cousin was leather seats, alloy wheels and black paint that continued on to the roof and doors, too. Thus ever did the muscle car/police car pas de deux play out.
Back at the turn of the prior century, however, Studebaker was forging a reputation for toughness in Arizona. No one is exactly sure how this came to be, but Richard Quinn, a former editor of the Antique Studebaker Club newsletter, suspects that one local sheriff had some luck with Studebaker, discovering that the marque's performance matched its rugged reputation, and he told his compatriots--most of whom ended up with Studebakers themselves. Arizona only has 15 counties, yet a dozen of their sheriffs used Studebakers to patrol the land.
Studebaker had three car lines in 1925-'26, all of which were powered by straight-six engines: the 113-inch wheelbase three-to-five-passenger Standard Six with a 50hp engine; the 120-inch wheelbase three-to-five-passenger Special Six with a 65hp engine; and the Big Six, with a 75hp engine to push around the bulk of a 127-inch wheelbase and up-to-seven-passenger capacity. The Special Six and the Big Six shared external engine dimensions and a five-inch stroke; only the bore (3.5 inches and 289-cu.in. for the Special, 3.78 inches and 354-cu.in. for the Big Six) was different. Dropping the Big Six engine into the Special Six was a no-brainer.
The result, a five-passenger Duplex Phaeton body (a hardtop with optional side curtains, a new body style launched in the fall of 1924) with the 75hp Big Six engine, quickly gained favor with law enforcement types in the desert Southwest. And it still retailed for $1,575--toward the lower end of the Special Six price range, but offering the same power as cars costing twice or three times as much.
The new Studebaker was seemingly made for the desert: Wide-open enough that air could circulate through the car as you drove, yet with a hard cloth top to prevent the top of your head from getting pummeled by the sun's angry rays. The retractable side curtains, which rolled up like a window shade, didn't do much for security, but in the colder and rainier days of an Arizona winter, they were sufficient for comfort. And seven-passenger comfort was simply too much for the rude, lewd, skewed, tattooed, and otherwise screwed who rode in the back of a Studebaker.
The car's reputation became such that Studebaker commissioned a book on it, The Arizona Sheriff, by Major Grover F. Sexton, the deputy from Yavapai. In 48 pages, it detailed the brave deeds of law enforcement officers and their trusty Studebakers as together they hunted down some of the most wanton criminals ever committed to purple prose. A single two-page ad for the car appeared inside.
It is from this, Richard Quinn believes, that the five-passenger Sport Phaeton with the Big Six was able to acquire its nickname, Sheriff. "There was no evidence of any special marketing to law enforcement," he told us, nor of the state of Arizona pitching Studebaker to make such a car to fit its needs. "The sheriffs probably just went to the local dealer and bought theirs off the showroom floor," he surmises.
Further proof of the Sheriff's combination of speed and mettle: In April of 1926, Ab Jenkins and Ray Peck took Jenkins's Sheriff on a trip from Los Angeles to Salt Lake City, accomplishing the 781 pre-Interstate miles in a Western Union-verified 16 hours, 17 minutes--breaking the previous driven record by nearly 71/2 hours, and beating the fastest train time by more than eight hours. Although they averaged 48 MPH, Jenkins and Peck had the car up to 81 MPH in places.
That journey was so successful that Studebaker took out ads in major metropolitan newspapers to tout it; however, it was topped two months later, with the same players on board. This time, Jenkins and Peck traveled from New York to San Francisco, a 3,471-mile journey. Western Union confirmed the departure and arrival times, and the trip was made in 86 hours, 20 minutes--shattering the previous record by nearly 161/2 hours and beating the quickest train time for the same distance (92 hours, including connections). The sole mechanical alteration to the car was a 48-gallon fuel tank.
Our feature car is owned by Frank Wenzel of Palm Springs, California. It was restored once, by two owners. The first owner started working on it in 1986 and finally gave up in the middle of last decade; Frank then bought it and completed its restoration. "My 1923 seven-passenger touring car cruises at 55 to 60 MPH with the same engine," Frank tells us. "The Sheriff car easily goes 70 MPH, and could go faster. And the four-wheel brakes make a major difference as well!" The steel wheels on this example indicate the addition of Studebaker's optional, new-for-1926 four-wheel braking system; only two years prior, Studebaker was taking out newspaper ads detailing exactly why four-wheel brakes were unnecessary, but market forces dictated that the company change its tune.
Go back far enough and there is a point where everything connects; whether this is a man's rib or a cluster of random proteins crawling out of a primordial puddle is your call. Regardless, it's a full-size engine in a medium-size car. A machine that, while not specifically developed for the needs of Arizona law enforcement, was so loved by the constabulary that their title, Sheriff, was applied to it and sent forth in period advertising. But the muscle car/police car parallels meet at a very definite point in time and space: in 1926, in the state of Arizona, by way of South Bend, Indiana.
Studebaker moved to an optional four-wheel brake system for 1926; body-colored steel wheels confirmed their presence.
Owner, Frank Wenzel
The classic VW Beetle is probably the single most iconic car ever made. Regardless of where you go, you will see a VW Beetle somewhere on the road. While the uninitiated may think they are uncomfortable and twitchy, the truth is that the interior of a Bug is kind of like Dr. Who's Tardis: it is a lot bigger on the inside that it looks. That doesn’t mean every Beetle you hop into is comfortable - the seats are very simple in design, using a smattering of steel springs and horsehair padding.
Our 1973 standard Beetle had the original seats with the original covers, which were in surprisingly good shape considering they are 50 years old. In fact, this car was built in May 1973. The seats were serviceable for a casual driver, but you could feel the springs moving in your back and posterior. The driver side cover was decent but the passenger side lower had developed some cracks, so their days were numbered. The Bug already had a big bore 1834-cc with twin carbs and custom cam, along with a Freeway Flyer trans and the car had been lowered 1.5 inches, so the interior needed some resto-modding to match. We picked up the phone and called TMI Products to see what they had to offer, and much to our surprise, the answer was quite a bit.
With the seats out on the bench, you can really see just how crusty they really are. These desperately need some new clothes. Photo: Jefferson Bryant
We expected a few stock patterns, and maybe a couple of ready-made custom layouts. Instead, we had a world of colors and patterns to choose from. This really opened the door to fantasy land, and in the end, we settled on a really beautiful turquoise houndstooth center fabric with a cream vinyl outer. This design was carried throughout the interior- front seats, rears, and door panels. This isn’t something TMI did special for us; this is how they operate, and it elevated the interior from stock to striking. Along with the covers, we also ordered a set of new seat foams, which allow you to ditch the stiff uncomfortable horsehair pads.
Once we had the covers off, we saw that these seats had been “customized” at some point with some cardboard over the springs to stiffen the seats. The original padding was quite stiff and had no give left. We removed all of it in favor of the new foams from TMI, which add much needed compliance to the cushions. There are a couple unique aspects of the VW seats. Instead of hog rings, the buckets use sharp metal tabs to pierce the upholstery. Because of this, you need some listing wire. The new covers do not come with this, but the original wire should be reusable if it is not badly rusted. If it is too far gone or missing, a little strip of bailing wire is a suitable replacement. The covers also use a drawstring on the bottom cushion to pull it tight. This is tied to either side of the frame.
The two halves separate by removing the large shoulder bolts on the sides. The bolt is a 10mm Allen-head. Photo: Jefferson Bryant
We ran into a big problem on our seats when we took them apart, however. This being our first VW Bug, we were not aware that VW seats changed quite a bit and that they are often swapped around. We ordered covers for our '74 Beetle, and when we were ready to install the seat back covers, the new foams didn’t make any sense of how they fit. We called TMI tech support and sent some pics. Turns out we had 1973 seats; in fact, the car was a '73, but titled as a '74. The DMV must have made a typo, as the VIN matches. '73 Volkswagen seat backs are a one-year only, and we had covers for 1974-'76 seats. Luckily, we were able to find a set of '74 seat backs, which will swap over to the '73 lower frame, so crisis averted. Let this be a warning to you: before you order seat covers for a Beetle, check to make sure you have the right year. It was not something we thought to do, and was a clerical error on the vehicle’s title - even the guy we bought the car from told us it was a '74, so understand that you don’t know what you don’t know sometimes.
Installing the covers was a simple process. Each one takes about 20-30 minutes per section (back and lower), and we had both seats done in about 2-3 hours, all told. The finished seats shown here are without the plastic trim that they should have. One side on each of our seats had broken plastic trim, which we need to replace. That will be done later when we replace the dash and all the interior plastic trim parts at once. The new seats are much more comfortable and they look incredible inside the VW. They look great, and our backs and backsides appreciate the change.
Photo: Jefferson Bryant
TMI Products •(888) 460-0640 • tmiproducts.com
“Gee, another iron small-block Chevy block? That’s hardly news.”
If you are an aggressively jaded LS engine enthusiast, this is probably not ground-breaking or exciting information. But despite inroads by the LS family, the small-block Chevy lovers of the world are not yet ready to give up on their venerated engine. It’s no secret that despite the bajillion small-blocks that Chevrolet produced over the decades that suitable cores for the popular small-block are disappearing at a prodigious rate. Of those survivors, optimal candidates for a performance build are becoming harder to find. Try to locate an affordable standard bore, 2-bolt 400 block today. If you do, the owner will want serious coin for a crusty casting.
But now there’s another alternative. Summit Racing recognized this shortfall and along with the BluePrint engine people stepped up for brand new tooling for a series of iron blocks. Just as importantly, the quality of the casting and machine work is impressive. The partners sought out a reputable casting facility in Germany to do the heavy lifting while the CNC machine work is finished here in the USA. So yes, the blocks originate from overseas, but these castings cross the Atlantic, not the Pacific.
Among the many welcome upgrades to the new SPC Summit block is the addition of priority lubrication to the mains. This is evidenced by the third oil galley that plumbs oil directly from the filter to the main journals instead of first oiling the lifters as with production small-block Chevy engines. This ensures plenty of oil to the engine’s rotating assembly. Photo: Jeff Smith
Enough generalities. For small-block connoisseurs, the allure is in the details. Summit labels this new block the Street, Performance, Competition (SPC). The blocks are offered with a choice of two bore diameters of 4.00- or 4.120-inches. Plus you have the option of either a traditional two-piece rear main seal or the later one-piece version. Finally, the larger bore blocks are available in either the 350 main journal diameter or the larger 400ci version. Summit is considering also offering finished honed blocks as another option.
But this new SPC piece is not merely a duplicate of an earlier factory block. Right off, all blocks are cast using a stronger Class 35 iron alloy and employ nodular iron main caps. Like their production cousins, the center three main caps are attached with four bolts with 7/16-inch inners and smaller 3/8-inch versions for the splayed outer bolts that Summit’s Brian Nutter tells us the outer bolts are there mainly to limit lateral cap movement but also add additional bulkhead strength.
A critical point is that this block has been upgraded to priority main oiling. Production small-blocks lube the mains and rods only after first feeding the lifters. The addition of a dedicated main oil galley pushes oil directly to the mains to ensure the lower end is properly lubricated.
The deck height on these new blocks is shorter at 9.00 inches mainly because most aftermarket pistons are designed around this deck height. To improve head gasket sealing, the deck thickness is an impressive 0.600-inch and all the cylinder head bolt holes are blind. This means the head bolt holes do not intrude into the water jacket.
The main caps for this new SPC block are of a higher strength nodular iron material. The inner main cap bolts are 7/16-inch while the outers are 3/8-inch with a lower torque value. Both are 180,000 psi fasteners that re equal to an ARP 8740 bolt. We expect that companies like ARP will soon have both main cap bolt and stud kits available. Also note the cutouts in the base of the main caps to help remove the caps from the block.Photo: Jeff Smith
Speaking of coolant flow through the block, the block designers invested significant effort into improving coolant flow. The cylinder walls are siamesed which means the cylinder walls connect at the midpoint while increasing the volume around the tops of the cylinders by pulling the lifter valley walls inboard. This can be easily spotted by the pushrod clearance radius cuts made into the lifter valley walls. There are also pipe threads cut into the all main lubrication galleys to accommodate ¼-inch NPT plugs.
The cylinder walls are also strengthened. The blocks can accommodate up to a 4.185-inch bore diameter and still maintain a minimum wall thickness of 0.220-inch especially around the thrust surfaces. The as-delivered bore size for the 4.00-inch bore versions is actually 3.995-inch while the larger bores are at 4.120-inch to allow for honing to the standard diameters for piston clearance.
Note the machined reliefs in the lifter valley walls for pushrod clearance. This is because both inner walls have been moved inboard to create a larger water jacket area around the cylinders. This new block also accommodates a factory hydraulic roller cam configuration with the machined stands for the lifter spider as well as taller lifter bores for factory roller lifters. Photo: Jeff Smith
Another welcome addition is that all the blocks are fitted with provisions for a factory style hydraulic roller camshaft. Three pedestals are cast and threaded to attach the factory spider and the lifter bores are taller for use with factory hydraulic roller lifters. The camshaft height is also in the stock location so it will accept a standard single or double-roller small-bock cam drive.
These taller lifter bores do require a 0.300-inch taller roller lifter when using a mechanical or hydraulic roller, link-bar lifter and Summit notes that using these taller lifters means the heads must be removed to remove the lifters from the bores, much like an LS engine. This means that changing camshafts with taller lifters will demand removing the heads. Of course, this block can also be used with a flat tappet camshaft.
The Summit SPC block is also machined for a factory cam limiter plate (shown here - purchased separately) that will require the use of a stepped nose camshaft just like 1986 and later factory roller cam blocks. Photo: Jeff Smith
Summit’s Mike Schmidt tells us that these blocks are all machined on high-speed Makino CNC machines which not only leaves a very smooth, final surface but with computer numerical control the orientation of lifter bores to the cam centerline, among other positions, should be exceptionally accurate. Accurate valve timing would also contribute to making more power. It’s a subtle point, but this is the same approach used to build competition engines where accuracy is critical.
Another nice addition is this Summit block is machined for the factory hydraulic roller cam retention plate. If this plate is used this also demands a stepped nose style camshaft which eliminates the hassle of setting camshaft endplay clearance.
This particular block was built with a two-piece rear main seal configuration but Summit does offer versions that can use the more modern one-piece rear main seal. The one-piece adapter is purchase separately. Note the machining that leaves all the finished surfaces extremely smooth. Photo: Jeff Smith
Moving to the bottom end, the block has been factory cast with reliefs in the area just above the oil pan rail to produce clearance (depending upon connecting rod design) for up to a 3.75-inch stroke. This area is cast solid so if additional clearance is needed, there are no coolant passages in this pan rail area to worry about.
To accommodate a wide variety of production block applications, the SPC block includes the stock mechanical fuel pump mount using a stock length pushrod along with the stock spin-on oil filter location. The stock three-bolt engine mounts are logically present along with three freeze plug provisions per side with two more front and rear. Keep in mind that this block will require two more brass freeze plugs compared to a standard small-block kit. In addition, you will need nine ¼-inch NPT Allen plug for all the oil galley and water jacket plugs along with a pair of 1/8-inch NPT plugs.
The twin 1/8-inch NPT tapped holes in this boss are there to access drilling oil passages for the front of the block to feed the lifter passages from both the front and the rear of the block. These holes must be blocked with pipe plugs during assembly.Photo: Jeff Smith
All these Summit blocks are machined for the later model, passenger side dip stick location which requires the same configuration oil pan. The engine is, of course, a wet sump design and is machined to accept the typical standard or high volume small-block or big-block Chevy oil pump.
The price of these blocks at the time of this writing is just north of $2,000, which might seem high to some. But considering that a machine shop will charge between $800 or more to clean, Magnaflux, deck the block to be parallel with the crank centerline, bore, torque plate hone, and align hone the mains. Add this to an initial used block cost of around $200 and you are halfway to the price of this brand new casting. Yes, you will still have to torque plate hone this new block but the quality of the machine work on the rest of block certainly adds significant value.
The reliefs for up to a 3.75-inch stroke crank are cast into this new block. Additionally, the inboard pan rails are solid with no water jackets hiding beneath so if additional clearance is needed, as for a 4.00-inch stroke crank, for example, there is no danger of breaking into a water jacket.Photo: Jeff Smith
This new Summit SPC block may not be the first choice for the average basic engine rebuilder. But it does fill a need for the performance builder with aspirations of big horsepower numbers. Summit says this block is more than capable of reliably delivering 700+ horsepower and there are rumors of a 1,500-hp blown application that is putting the test to this new block.
There are other blocks out there that offer some or most of these same features but they do so with a much higher price. With all the excellent features, it is certainly worthy of consideration especially if your next project calls for a stroker crank and a roller cam. There are ways to maintain the budget and still built a quality engine. That notion just moved a little closer to reality with the Summit SPC block.
The Summit SPC block has a shorter deck height of 9.00 inches as opposed to the OE spec of 9.025-inches. This is because most aftermarket piston compression heights use the 9.00-inch deck height figure. All the cylinder head bolt holes are blind which means no contact with coolant passages.Photo: Jeff Smith
This new SPC block uses the 1981 and later passenger car side dip stick location which requires the use of the same era oil pan. The final choice of oil pan is determined by several factors including whether your specific block employs a one or two-piece rear main seal.Photo: Jeff Smith
he areas just above the oil filter housing (the block is shown upside down) offers a separate drilled and tapped oil pressure outlet that could be used to feed a turbocharger or other external oil feed. The other two bolts holes are for mechanical clutch linkage. Photo: Jeff Smith
This new Summit block is also fitted with a third freeze plug on each side of the block where production 350 small-blocks used only two freeze plugs. The BPE cast into the block stands for Blueprint Engines, which is partnered with Summit to produce blocks for complete engines. Summit is the only outlet for bare blocks. Photo: Jeff Smith
Summit tells us that by mid-summer, the company will be adding a big-block Chevrolet version of the SPC block, in the MK IV configuration. These blocks will be offered in 4.500 and 4.600-inch bore sizes with either two- or one-piece rear main seals. In addition, there will be a choice of a 9.800 or 10.200-inch deck heights. Like the small-block versions, these blocks will be cast in Germany and machined in the USA. A 4.600-inch bore with a 4.250-inch stroke on a standard-deck Rat motor would produce a 565ci Rat motor. At 1.25 horsepower per cubic inch, a normally aspirated, single four-barrel combination would produce just north of 700 horsepower.
All specs are in inches, unless otherwise noted.
Block material: Class 35 Iron Alloy
Block Weight: 181-194 lbs., depending upon bore size
Bore size: 3.996 or 4.120
Bore Spacing: 4.400
Maximum bore size: 4.185
Deck Height: 9.00” (+0.005 to -0.0003)
Deck thickness: 0.600
Cylinder head bolt holes: Blind
Main journal size: 350 style - 2.4485 / 400 style - 2.649
Main cap bolts: 7/16” Inner, 3/8” outer
Main cap material: Nodular iron
Clearance for 3.750-inch stroke: Yes
Cam location: Stock position
Min. cylinder wall thickness at 4.185”: 0.220”
Lifter bore size: 8.437 +/- 0.0003
Cam bearing bore size: 2.000 +/- 0.001
Lubrication system: Priority main
Machined for OEM hyd. roller lifters: Yes
Oil pan rails: Solid (no water jackets)
Starter motor bolt holes: Drilled and tapped for both straight and offset
When you invest this much into a very nice cylinder block, you want everyone to know where it comes from.
Photo: Jeff Smith
All parts in this list are sourced from Summit Racing.