Next Article in Journal
Anserine and Carnosine Induce HSP70-Dependent H2S Formation in Endothelial Cells and Murine Kidney
Next Article in Special Issue
Isolation, Physicochemical Characterization, and Biological Properties of Inotodiol, the Potent Pharmaceutical Oxysterol from Chaga Mushroom
Previous Article in Journal
Physicochemical Properties and Oxidative Stability of an Emulsion Prepared from (-)-Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate Modified Chicken Wooden Breast Myofibrillar Protein
Previous Article in Special Issue
Bioactive Activities of the Phenolic Extract from Sterile Bracts of Araucaria angustifolia
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antioxidants
Volume 12
Issue 1
10.3390/antiox12010065
antioxidants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparison of Antioxidant Properties and Metabolite Profiling of Acer pseudoplatanus Leaves of Different Colors

by
Ming Zhang
1,
Jeehwan Choe
2,
Ting Bu
1,
Shuilin Liu
3 and
Sooah Kim
1,*
1
Department of Environment Science and Biotechnology, Jeonju University, Jeonju 55069, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Livestock, Korea National College of Agriculture and Fisheries, Jeonju 54874, Republic of Korea
3
College of Horticulture, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2023, 12(1), 65; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12010065
Submission received: 19 October 2022 / Revised: 15 December 2022 / Accepted: 22 December 2022 / Published: 28 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antioxidant Compounds of Plants Materials: From Extraction to Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Acer pseudoplatanus (maple) is a widely grown ornamental plant. In addition to its ornamental and ecological value, it also has potentially high economic value. It is a rich source of polyphenols and exhibits antioxidant activity. However, the relationship between polyphenol content and antioxidant activity in maple leaves of different colors (green, yellow, and red) has not yet been investigated. In this study, the total polyphenol (TP), total flavonoid (TFlav), tannin (TET), chlorophyll a and b (Chl a and b), total anthocyanin (TAN), and total carotene (TAC) contents in maple leaves of different colors were evaluated. Their antioxidant activities were determined based on the inhibition of lipid oxidation, DPPH scavenging, ferric ion-reducing antioxidant power, and iron-chelating abilities. The concentrations of TP, TET, TFlav, TAN, and TAC in red maple leaves were higher than those in green and yellow maple leaves. In addition, red maple leaves showed a higher antioxidant effect than the leaves of the other two colors. We observed that antioxidant activity was positively correlated with TP, TFlav, and TAN and negatively correlated with Chl a and b. Finally, we analyzed the metabolites of the different colored (i.e., green, yellow, and red) maple leaves using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) and found that the metabolite profile significantly varied between the different colors. These results suggest that red leaves are a good source of polyphenols and antioxidants and have potential use in the development of functional foods and medicinal applications.

1. Introduction

Oxidative stress disrupts the balance between reactive oxygen species (ROS), free radicals, and antioxidant defenses [1]. It can play a crucial role in the development of various diseases, such as cancer [2], malaria [3], arteriosclerosis [4], rheumatoid arthritis [5], and neurodegenerative diseases [6], and the aging process [7]. Antioxidants are synthesized in the human body or taken up from the environment through diet [8]. Although synthetic antioxidants are widely used in the food, medicine, cosmetics, and other fields, there are safety issues associated with these agents. Previous research has indicated that long-term intake of synthetic antioxidants is associated with certain teratogenic and carcinogenic risks [9].
Bioactive compounds, including polyphenols, as a nutritional component, are usually presented small amounts in food, and have been reported to have various health effects, such as antioxidation, bacteriostasis, anti-inflammation, and immunity enhancement. Therefore, bioactive substances have been widely used in foods, pharmaceuticals, and cosmetics [10,11,12,13]. Polyphenols play an important role as antioxidants. Although human diets such as fruits [14], vegetables [15], tea [16], and wine [17] are rich in polyphenols, it is also necessary to find a natural, safe, and economic antioxidant in industrial production for sustainability [18]. Previous studies have found that olive rape [19], durum wheat bran [20], Fraxinus ornus bark [21], and potato peel waste [22] are good sources of natural polyphenols. In particular, maple leaves are inexpensive, easy to obtain, and have significant value for the rational use of resources and sustainable development.
Anthocyanins, which are flavonoids, play an important role in physiological and biochemical processes in plants, such as leaf color change. When leaves are subjected to biotic and abiotic stresses, they are synthesized and accumulate in plant vacuoles [23,24]. In autumn, under the influence of photoperiod and low temperature, maple leaves begin to senesce, chlorophyll content begins to decline, and anthocyanin content begins to rise; therefore, maple leaves gradually change color from green to red [25]. Previous studies have shown that reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels increase and antioxidant capacity decreases during leaf senescence [26,27].
Previous studies on the antioxidant capacity of maple products included analyses of maple syrup [28], maple sap [29], bark extracts [30], and leaf extracts [31]. However, to the best of our knowledge, no study has compared the antioxidant capacity and metabolite profiles of maple leaves of different colors simultaneously.
Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the antioxidant potential of different colored maple leaves and compare the content of total polyphenols, flavonoids, tannins, chlorophyll a and b, and carotenoids in green, yellow, and red leaves. The antioxidant properties of green, yellow, and red leaves were determined using four different methods: thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical (DPPH), metal chelation, and ferric ion-reducing antioxidant power (FRAP). Finally, to investigate the metabolic pathways associated with the colors, metabolite profiling of green, yellow, and red leaves was conducted using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Maple Leaves

Maple leaves of different colors (green, yellow, and red) were collected from Jeonju University (Jeonju, Jeonbuk, Republic of Korea) on 6 November 2020 (Figure 1). The leaves collected from multiple trees were divided into three groups according to their color and then dried at 40 °C to constant weight. The dried leaves were ground using a mortar and pestle and stored at −60 °C until use.

2.2. Polyphenol Content

One gram of sample was extracted with 20 mL of 50% aqueous methanol (JT Baker, Radnor, PA, USA) for 3 h at 25 °C, with shaking at 200 rpm. The sample was centrifuged at 195× g for 15 min at 25 °C (1580R, Labogene, Bjarkesvej, Lillerød, Denmark), then the supernatant was collected [1,32,33].

2.2.1. Total Polyphenol (TP)

The Folin–Ciocalteu method was used to determine the TP content [32]. Briefly, 16 μL of the extract and 60 μL of the Folin–Ciocalteu reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA. Unless otherwise stated, all reagents are purchased from Sigma-Aldrich) were mixed for 5 min at 25 °C. Sixty microliter of 60 g/L Na2CO3 were added and incubated for 90 min at 25 °C. The absorbance of the mixture was measured at 725 nm (Multiskan SkyHigh, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). TP was expressed as milligrams of gallic acid equivalents per gram of dry weight (mg GAE/g DW).

2.2.2. Total Extractable Tannin (TET)

The TET content was measured as previously described [18]. Briefly, to precipitate tannins, 110 mg of PVPP (Polyvinylpyrrolidon) was added to 1 mL of the extract, mixed, and centrifuged at 970× g for 10 min at 4 °C (1730R, Labogene). The TP content in the supernatant (corresponding to the non-precipitated phenols) was determined using the Folin–Ciocalteu method, as described in Section 2.2.1. The TET content was calculated by subtracting the non-precipitated phenols from TP.

2.2.3. Total Flavonoid Content (TFlav)

The TFlav content was determined as described previously [34]. Briefly, 20 μL of the extract was mixed with 80 μL of ddH2O (double distilled H2O), 6 μL of 5% NaNO2 solution, and 6 μL of 10% AlCl3 solution for 6 min, followed by addition of 80 μL of 4% NaOH (Duksan, Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea) solution. The mixture was incubated in the dark for 30 min at 25 °C, and the absorbance was measured at 510 nm (Multiskan SkyHigh, Thermo Fisher Scientific). The results are expressed in mg QE/g DW (QE, quercetin equivalents).

2.2.4. Chlorophyll Content

The chlorophyll content was determined using a previously described method [34]. Briefly, 100 mg of leaves was mixed with 4 mL of 80% acetone (JT Baker). After rinsing several times with 80% acetone, the sample was completely transferred to a test tube and the volume was adjusted to 10 mL with acetone. The mixture was centrifuged immediately at 1763× g for 10 min (1580R, Labogene). The absorbance of the mixture was measured at 646.8 nm and 663.2 nm (UV-1800, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The chlorophyll concentration was calculated using the following formula:
Chl a (mg/L) = (12.25 × D663.2) − (2.79 × D646.8),
Chl b (mg/L) = (21.50 × D646.8) − (5.10 × D663.2),
Chl a (mg/g) = [Chl a (mg/L) × 10 mL]/100 mg,
Chl b (mg/g) = [Chl b (mg/L) × 10 mL]/100 mg

2.2.5. Anthocyanin Content

Anthocyanin content was measured in the dark, as described by Al-Farsi et al. [32,35]. A pH 1.0 buffer was prepared by mixing 14.9 mg/mL of KCl and 0.2 mol/L of HCl (Duksan) at a ratio of 25:67 and a pH 4.5 buffer of 1.64 mg/mL of sodium acetate.
For extraction, the leaves (0.25 g) were homogenized in 20 mL of distilled water for 1 min and sonicated for 15 min. One mililiter of the supernatant was transferred to a 25 mL volumetric flask after centrifugation at 440× g for 10 min (1580R, Labogene) and adjusted to the final volume with buffer (pH 1.0). Another 1 mL of the supernatant was transferred to a 25 mL volumetric flask and adjusted to the final volume with pH 4.5 buffer. The absorbance values of these mixtures were measured at 510 and 700 nm (UV-1800, Shimadzu). The absorbance was calculated as follows:
Ab = (Ab510nm − Ab700nm) pH1.0 − (Ab510nm − Ab700nm) pH4.5
The total anthocyanin content was calculated using the following equation and expressed as cyanidin 3-glucoside equivalents:
Total anthocyanin content (mg/100 g) was calculated as Ab/eL × MW × D × V/G × 100;
where e = 26,900 (molar absorptivity of cyanidin 3-glucoside), L (cell path length) = 1 mL, MW (molecular weight of anthocyanins) = 449.2, D (dilution factor) = 25, V = 25 mL, and G = 250 mg.

2.2.6. Total Carotenoid Content

Total carotenoid content was measured as previously described [32]. The sample (2 g) was extracted multiple times with an acetone/ethanol (1:1) mixture containing 200 mg/L butylated hydroxytoluene until it turned colorless. After centrifugation at 440× g for 15 min (1580R, Labogene), the supernatant was collected. The volume of the combined supernatant was adjusted to 100 mL and the absorbance was measured at 470 nm (UV-1800, Shimadzu). Total carotenoid content was calculated using the following equation and expressed as mg per 100 g of sample weight:
Total carotenoid content (mg/g) = (Ab × V × 106)/(A1% × 100 G);
where Ab is the absorbance at 470 nm, V is the total volume of the extract, A1% is the average extinction coefficient of carotenoids (2500 M−1·cm−1), and G is the sample weight (g).

2.3. In Vitro Antioxidant Test

2.3.1. Evaluation of Antioxidant Activity in the Linoleic Acid Model System

The antioxidant activity of the extract was determined based on the inhibition of linoleic acid peroxidation, using the TBARS method [36,37,38].

Preparation and Treatment of Linoleic Acid Emulsions

Linoleic acid emulsion was prepared by mixing 300 μL of linoleic acid and Tween 20 in 50 mL of 0.2 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) as an emulsifier. Two milliliters of the extract (5 mg/mL DW) were mixed with 2 mL of linoleic acid emulsion in 0.2 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) at 50 °C for 5 days to accelerate the oxidation of lipids.

Thiobarbituric Acid Reactive Substances (TBARS)

Lipid oxidation was measured using the 2-thiobarbituric acid (TBA) method, as described previously, with slight modifications [39]. Briefly, 100 μL of the emulsion was mixed with 400 μL of TBA–TCA solution (20 mM TBA in 15% TCA) at 100 °C for 15 min. After cooling to 25 °C, 2 mL of chloroform (JT Baker) was added, the mixture was centrifuged at 431× g for 15 min at 4 °C (1730R, Labogene) and the supernatant was collected. The absorbance of the samples was measured at 532 nm using a microplate reader (Multiskan SkyHigh, Thermo Fisher Scientific). A sample containing the emulsion in TCA solution was used as a blank.

2.3.2. DPPH-Free Radical Scavenging Effect

DPPH radical scavenging activity was determined according to a previously described method [40], with minor modifications. Briefly, 50 mg/mL of sample solution was diluted to different concentrations in 50% methanol. DPPH solution (100 µL) was added to 100 μL of sample solutions of different concentrations, and the mixture was incubated at 25 °C for 30 min in the dark. The absorbance of the mixture was measured at 518 nm using a microplate reader (Multiskan SkyHigh, Thermo Fisher Scientific), and the percentage antioxidant activity (AA) was calculated using the following formula:
AA% = 100 − [(Absample − Abblank × 100)/Abcontrol];
where Abblank is the absorbance of the blank (100 μL of 50% aqueous methanol + 100 μL of sample extract solution), and Abcontrol is the absorbance of the control (100 μL of 50% aqueous methanol + 100 μL of DPPH). The IC50 values of different leaves were calculated using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 25, IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).

2.3.3. FRAP

FRAP assay was performed according to a previously described method, with some modifications [41]. The FRAP working reagent was prepared by mixing 25 mL of 300 mM acetate buffer (pH 3.6), 2.5 mL of 10 mM TPTZ (2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride) solution in 40 mM HCl, and 2.5 mL of 20 mM FeCl3·6H2O solution, incubated at 37 °C until further use. Twenty microliters of the extract (1.5625 mg/mL DW) was mixed with 180 μL of FRAP working reagent for 30 min in the dark. Then, the absorbances of the samples were measured at 593 nm using a microplate reader (Multiskan SkyHigh, Thermo Fisher Scientific). A standard curve of divalent iron ions was prepared using iron sulfate, and a reference experiment was conducted with ascorbic acid under the same experimental conditions. The results are expressed as ascorbic acid equivalents (AAE) per mg of dry plant material.

2.3.4. Chelation Capability of Metal Ions

The free radical scavenging activity of the iron chelators was determined using a previously described method, with slight modifications [42]. 6 μL of 2 mM FeCl2 and 12 μL of 5 mM ferrozine solution were added to 200 μL of the extract at different concentrations (0–50 mg/mL) and then incubated at 25 °C for 10 min. The absorbance of the mixture and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid EDTA (ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid; Duksan) control were determined at 562 nm using a microplate reader (Multiskan SkyHigh, Thermo Fisher Scientific). The ability of the extract to chelate ferrous ions was calculated using the following equation:
Chelating effect (%) = [1 − (Absample/Abcontrol)] × 100

2.4. Extraction and Analysis of Metabolites

Metabolites were extracted and analyzed as previously described, with slight modifications [43,44]. Briefly, 10 mg of dried sample was mixed with extraction solvents (methanol:chloroform:distilled water in a ratio of 14:4:2.85), vortexed for 30 min, and centrifuged at 24,000× g for 3 min at 4 °C (1730R, Labogene). Finally, 100 μL of the supernatant was vacuum dried using a vacuum concentrator (NB-503CIR, N-BIOTEK, Bucheon, Gyeonggi, Republic of Korea).
For chemical derivatization, we mixed 10 μL of methoxyamine hydrochloride in pyridine (40 mg/mL) for 90 min at 30 °C, followed by 45 μL of N-methyl-N-(trimethylsilyl) trifluoroacetamide (MSTFA) for 30 min at 30 °C. A mixture of fatty acid methyl esters (C8–C30) was used for quality control purposes. All the samples were analyzed within 24 h of derivatization.
The metabolites were analyzed using GC/MS (Shimadzu QP2010 Plus, Shimadzu) equipped with a column Rtx-5sil (30 m × 0.25 mm i.d. × 0.25 μm film thickness). The oven temperature was set at 50 °C for 2 min and programmed to 200 °C at a rate of 5 °C/min, which was held for 5 min, and then programmed to 330 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min, and finally held for 5 min. The temperatures of the interface and the ion source were set to 280 °C and 250 °C, respectively. Mass spectra were acquired in the mass range of 85–600 m/z at an ionization voltage of 70 eV.
The resulting data were deconvoluted using the Automated Mass Spectral Deconvolution and Identification System (AMDIS; version 3.2), and the metabolites were identified using the Golm Metabolome Database (GMD) [45]. The data were further processed using SpectConnect with an elution threshold of 1 min and support threshold of 70% [46]. The processed data were normalized using sum normalization and range scaling.

2.5. Statistical Analysis and Metabolic Network Analysis

Correlation plot, principal component analysis (PCA), and hierarchical clustering analysis (HCA) were conducted using OriginPro 2023 (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA), SIMCA (version 14.1, Umetrics, Umea, Sweden), and Metaboanalyst 5.0 (https://www.metaboanalyst.ca/, accessed on 19 October 2022), respectively. Differences in metabolites between the groups were evaluated using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Fisher’s LSD post hoc test (p < 0.05).

3. Results

3.1. Polyphenol Content

The content of polyphenols (represented by TP, TET, TFlav, Chl a, Chl b, TAN, and TAC) were significantly different in maple leaves of different colors (Table 1). In this study, the TP and TFlav content were much higher in the red leaves than those in the leaves of the other two colors (green and yellow). The amount of TP in red leaves (106.43 ± 3.828 mg GAE/g) was approximately two times higher than that in the green leaves (49.657 ± 2.501 mg GAE/g), and the TP content of yellow leaves was 69.05 ± 3.59 mg QE/g. The TFlav content of the red leaves (47.48 ± 1.109 mg QE/g) was approximately three times higher than that of the green leaves (17.50 ± 0.87 mg QE/g), and the TFlav content of yellow leaves was 29.60 ± 1.00 mg QE/g. In addition, red leaves contained the highest amount of TET (57.97 ± 3.59 mg GAE/g). There was no significant difference in TET content between the red and yellow leaves (57.41 ± 3.65 mg GAE/g), and it was significantly higher than that of green leaves (39.96 ± 2.65 mg GAE/g). Unsurprisingly, green leaves had more chlorophyll a and b than yellow and red leaves, which is consistent with previous reports [47,48]. In addition, TAN and TAC contents in red leaves were higher than those in the leaves of the other two colors. These results indicate that red maple is a potential source of phenolic compounds.
In the previous study, the similar methods have been widely used to determine the content of TP, TET and TFlav in various plants including maple, Dendropanax morbifera, and Mentha piperita L. [18,49,50]. The method for measurement of chlorophyll in this study have been used in various plants such as stevia and Lippia filifolia [51,52]. The handheld SPAD-502 chlorophyll meter could be used for determining relatively content of chlorophyll and showed the strong correlation with the method used in this study [53]. The pH differential method has been generally used for measurement of TAN content in various plants such as black carrot [54] and the average extension coefficient of carotenoids has been commonly used as the determination of total carotenoid content [55]. Although the methods used in this study have been generally used for measuring the content of polyphenols, the content of each polyphenols should be verified using other techniques such as high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) in further application.

3.2. Antioxidant Activity

3.2.1. TBARS

In this study, we determined the oxidation value of linoleic acid at different time points. As shown in Figure 2a, maple leaves of different colors had reduced lipid oxidation. This indicates that all maple leaves had antioxidant activity, regardless of color. Among these, red leaves showed the highest antioxidant effect. On day 5, the absorbance values (at 532 nm) of all extracts from leaves of different colors were significantly different from those of the control (p < 0.01). The absorbance of the red leaves was six times lower than that of the control. In addition, the absorbance value of the red leaves was lower than that of the green leaves (p < 0.05).

3.2.2. DPPH-Free Radical Scavenging Effect

The DPPH-free radical scavenging method is currently the most widely used method for determining antioxidant capacity owing to its simplicity, speed, and accuracy. DPPH is one of the most commonly used synthetic free radicals; the higher the IC50 value of DPPH, the lower its antioxidant effect. In this study, the DPPH free radical scavenging method was used to determine the free radical scavenging ability of maple leaf extracts [3].
The DPPH scavenging capacities of maple leaves of different colors are shown in Figure 2b. The antioxidant IC50 value of the red leaves was 6.53 mg/mL, which was lower than that of the green and yellow leaves. The IC50 value of yellow leaves was highest at 7.40 mg /mL, which is equivalent to the antioxidant capacity of ascorbic acid (0.11 mg/mL).

3.2.3. FRAP

The FRAP method is based on the principle that antioxidants reduce Fe3+-TPTZ to produce blue-violet Fe2+-TPTZ at low pH. Therefore, the absorbance at 593 nm can be used as an indicator of the total antioxidant capacity of the sample [56].
In this study, the FRAP values for maple extracts from the leaves of different colors varied over a wide range of 0.10–0.15 AAE/mg DW (Figure 2c). The FRAP value of red leaves was the highest (0.1532 AAE/mg DW), whereas that of green leaves was the lowest (0.1031 AAE/mg DW). The FRAP value of yellow leaves was 0.119 AAE/mg DW, suggesting that red leaves have a higher antioxidant effect than leaves of the other two colors.

3.2.4. Metal Ions Chelating Ability

Ferrous ions (Fe2+) cause lipid peroxidation and food deterioration. Therefore, the ability to chelate ferrous ions can reveal the antioxidant capacity of a substrate [57]. Ferrous ions form a red complex with ferrozine; the intensity of the red color decreases after the addition of chelating agents, which is used as an indicator of the chelating ability and antioxidant capacity of a compound [58].
Figure 2d shows the ferrous ion-chelating ability of maple leaves of different colors. The IC50 value of yellow leaves was observed to be the lowest (26.66 ± 1.19 mg/mL), and red leaves showed the weakest ability to chelate ferrous ions (51.02 ± 1.75 mg/mL). This indicates that yellow leaves had a higher antioxidant capacity than the leaves of the other two colors.
The results of the TBARS, DPPH, and FRAP assays demonstrated that red leaves had the highest antioxidant activity among all three colors (red > yellow > green). However, the yellow leaves had the strongest metal-ion chelating ability (yellow > green > red). This finding is similar to the results of previous studies showing that the antioxidant capacity of the same materials may be different based on the methods used [59] owing to the selective reaction of free radicals with antioxidants [60].

3.3. Correlation Coefficients of Antioxidant Activities and Polyphenols Content

Previous studies on grapes, Desmodium species, and Chinese dark teas [61] have revealed a relationship between polyphenols and antioxidant properties. TBARS, DPPH, and FRAP assays are the most commonly used methods for oxidation resistance testing. The higher the values of TBARS, DPPH, and metal chelation, the weaker the oxidation resistance. Conversely, the higher the value of FRAP, the stronger the oxidation resistance.
Figure 3 shows the correlation between the antioxidant activity and polyphenol content. The contents of TP, TET, and TFlav were negatively correlated with TBARS and DPPH values and positively correlated with FRAP values. This indicates that antioxidant activities were highly associated with the content of phenolic compounds and flavonoids in maple leaves.
Chlorophyll contents (Chl a and Chl b) were positively correlated with TBARS and DPPH values, whereas TAN and TCA were positively correlated with EDTA and FRAP values.
The content of TP, TET, and TFlav in red leaves and its antioxidant capacity (TBARS, DPPH, and FRAP) were higher, whereas the content of chlorophyll (Chl a and b) was lower than that in green and yellow leaves. Collectively, the antioxidant properties were negatively correlated with Chl a and b. On the other hand, they were positively correlated with TP, TET, and TFlav.

3.4. Metabolite Profiling

A total of 54 metabolites in the maple leaves of the three colors were identified by GMD. Among these, 23 metabolites were related to antioxidant activity and seven metabolites were polyphenolic acids (Table 2).
To reveal the metabolic differences between maple leaves of different colors, a principal component analysis (PCA) was performed. The PCA score scatter plot (Figure 4) showed a significant difference in the metabolite profiles between the three groups. PC 1 and PC 2 values from the PCA score scatter plot accounted for 78.3% and 69.1% of the total R2X (explained) and Q2 (predictive) variances, respectively, indicating a good model [84]. As shown in Table 3, the selected 20 metabolites with high absolute loading value which represent how each metabolite contributed to the new variables (PC 1 and PC 2) generated using the PCA model. Among the 53 metabolites identified, 41 metabolites such as succinic acid, inositol, and phenylalanine contributed positively to PC 1 and 26 metabolites contributed positively to PC 2 such as erythritol, γ-tocopherol, and phytol. On the contrary, 12 metabolites including D-fructose, shikimic acid, and D-glucose contributed negatively to PC 1, and 27 metabolites including D-pinitol, trehalose, and fumaric acid contributed negatively to PC 2.
In the heatmap from HCA, the metabolite profiles of the six biological replicates in each group were similar; however, the profiles varied among the three groups, represented by different colors (Figure 5). The metabolite profiles of maple leaves changed from green to red, and the pattern of yellow leaves was more similar to that of green leaves than of red leaves. Moreover, the relative contents of the different metabolites in each group could be distinguished by the differences in color. One-way ANOVA and Fisher’s LSD post hoc test revealed that the level of 48 metabolites was significantly different between the three groups [p-value < 0.05 with false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05]. Of these 48 metabolites, eight metabolites (including gallic acid, ascorbic acid, and shikimic acid) were higher in red leaves than in green and yellow leaves. Conversely, the levels of 27 metabolites (including threonine, valine, glycine, and fumaric acid) were higher in green leaves than in yellow and red leaves.
By analyzing the metabolites of maple leaves of different colors, we found 48 different metabolites in maple leaves of different colors (p < 0.05). The leaves could be divided into three categories by PCA and HCA, indicating that there were significant differences in the metabolite profiles between leaves of different colors.

4. Discussion

Phenolic compounds with good antioxidant properties are important parameters for evaluating the antioxidant properties of plant extracts [85]. According to a previous study, the content of polyphenols in various plant leaves ranged from 11.14 to 175.35 mg/g [86]. Among the twenty four plants studied, only seven plants (including Malus domestica and Cydonia oblonga) had higher polyphenol content than red maple leaves. In this study, the antioxidant activity was measured using four different methods, and we found that the antioxidant capacity of red leaves was much higher than that of the leaves of the other two colors (red > yellow > green). The DPPH scavenging IC50 value of red leaves was 6.53 mg/mL. Herbal and low-cost biological resources have been the focus of antioxidant research. In previous research, the DPPH scavenging IC50 value of Cassia fistula L. seed extract [87], Gracilaria changii crude extract [88], and Erechtites hieraciifolius [89] was 11.07 mg/mL, 14.70 mg/mL, and 8.46 mg/mL, respectively. In addition, that of various vegetables such as Murraya koenigii, Trigonella foenum-graecum, Centella asiatica, and Amaranthus spp. was 9.62 mg/mL, 27.69 mg/mL, 19.89 mg/mL, and 27.27 mg/mL, respectively [90]. Another study showed that the IC50 values of various fruits (such as mangosteen, orange, pomelo, grapes, papaya, grape, rose apple, and jackfruit) ranged from 11.18 to 110.46 mg/mL [91]. Compared with the antioxidant properties of various biological materials, the antioxidant properties of maple leaves are not only stronger than those of low-cost biological resources but also stronger than those of some fruits. Therefore, our findings suggest that maple leaves, particularly red leaves, are a good source of polyphenols and antioxidants.
Changes in leaves and carotenoids, among which the degradation of chlorophyll, is a sign of senescence [92,93]. In our observations (as shown in Figure 1), the outer leaves of maple were more converted to red sooner than the inner leaves. This may be because the outer leaves are exposed to more light and higher temperatures during the day and bear lower temperatures at night. This is consistent with previous studies showing that shading slows down the loss of chlorophyll, and the difference in temperature between day and night is conducive to the accumulation of anthocyanins [94,95]. The degradation of chlorophyll, which plays an essential role in capturing light energy, is a critical step in the accumulation of ROS during senescence. Additionally, the synthesis of anthocyanin (which acts as an antioxidant) is an important step in reducing oxidative damage [96,97]. In this study, we compared the chlorophyll content between green, yellow, and red maple leaves. The results agreed with previous reports and demonstrated that the chlorophyll content showed a decreasing tendency from green to red. In contrast, the anthocyanin and carotenoid contents were highest in the red maple leaves. These results are in agreement with a previous study that showed anthocyanin accumulation in red leaves [47]. Previous studies have reported that flavonoid/anthocyanin accumulation is affected by carotenoid accumulation [98] and chlorophyll degradation [99]. Our results also showed a positive and negative correlation between anthocyanins, and carotenoid or chlorophyll content, respectively.
Phenolic compounds are important secondary metabolites in plants that mainly originate from the phenylpropane metabolic pathway [100]. In plants, photosynthetic products generate phosphoenolpyruvic acid (PEP) and erythrose 4-phosphate (E4P) through the Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas (EMP) and pentose phosphate (PPP) pathways, respectively. PEP and E4P enter the shikimic acid pathway and generate phenylalanine, the starting substrate of the phenylphenyne pathway. After a series of enzymatic reactions, flavonoids (such as catechins, proanthocyanidins, and anthocyanins) can be synthesized [100,101]. In this study, we found that the content of phenylalanine in green leaves is the highest, and that the antioxidant-related substances (such as cryptochlorogenic acid, gallic acid, neochlorogenic acid, cianidanol, α-tocopherol, and ascorbic acid) gradually increased during leaf senescence, by further metabolite analysis. These results are consistent with previous results in this study, correlating with higher total phenolic content and stronger antioxidant capacity in red leaves.
In addition, previous studies have reported that the total amount of phenolic acids and antioxidant capacity were low in samples with a high content of free amino acids. The late-harvested sweet potato leaves showed higher antioxidant capacity and polyphenol content, but lower amino acid content than the early- and middle-harvests [102]. Similarly, it was found that the total flavonoid content of Ocimum basilicum L. significantly decreased under high amino acid treatment [103]. Consistent with previous studies, our study also showed that most amino acids (such as alanine, aspartic acid, leucine, phenylalanine, threonine, tyrosine, valine, glutamate, glycine, and γ-aminobutyric acid) in green leaves were present at higher levels than those in other colors. However, the polyphenolic acid content and antioxidant capacity were lower, indicating that amino acids may be converted to other phenolic compounds via the shikimic acid/phenylpropanoid/flavonoid synthetic pathway.

5. Conclusions

Maples are widely planted and are easily obtained in the northern temperate zone. In this study, we compared the polyphenol content and antioxidant properties of maple leaves of three colors (green, yellow, and red). The levels of TP, TET, TFlav, TAN, and TAC were higher in red leaves than in the other leaves. However, Chl a and b levels were lower in the red leaves. In addition, the antioxidant capacity of the red leaves was higher than that of the green and yellow leaves. PCA and HCA results revealed significant differences in metabolite profiles in maple leaves among green, yellow, and red colors. This study is the first to evaluate the level of polyphenols, antioxidant effects, and metabolites in maple leaves according to color. Therefore, red maple leaves may be used as a potential source of natural antioxidants and could be applied in the development of functional foods and pharmaceuticals.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.Z. and S.K.; Methodology, M.Z., T.B. and S.L.; Formal analysis, M.Z., T.B. and S.L.; Investigation, M.Z., J.C. and T.B.; Resources, J.C. and S.K.; Data curation, M.Z., T.B., S.L., J.C. and S.K.; Writing—original draft preparation, M.Z. and S.L.; Writing—review and editing, J.C. and S.K.; Supervision, S.K.; Project administration, S.K.; Funding acquisition, S.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (No. 2022R1F1A1071270).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Vijayalaxmi, S.; Jayalakshmi, S.K.; Sreeramulu, K. Polyphenols from different agricultural residues: Extraction, identification and their antioxidant properties. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 52, 2761–2769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Gill, J.G.; Piskounova, E.; Morrison, S.J. Cancer, oxidative stress, and metastasis. Cold Spring Harbor. Symp. Quant. Biol. 2016, 81, 163–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Postma, N.S.; Mommers, E.C.; Eling, W.M.; Zuidema, J. Oxidative stress in malaria; implications for prevention and therapy. Pharm. World Sci. 1996, 18, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Harrison, D.; Griendling, K.K.; Landmesser, U.; Hornig, B.; Drexler, H. Role of oxidative stress in atherosclerosis. Am. J. Cardiol. 2003, 91, 7A–11A. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wruck, C.J.; Fragoulis, A.; Gurzynski, A.; Brandenburg, L.O.; Kan, Y.W.; Chan, K.; Hassenpflug, J.; Freitag-Wolf, S.; Varoga, D.; Lippross, S.; et al. Role of oxidative stress in rheumatoid arthritis: Insights from the nrf2-knockout mice. Nat. Prod. Res. 2011, 70, 844–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Mateen, S.; Moin, S.; Khan, A.Q.; Zafar, A.; Fatima, N. Increased reactive oxygen species formation and oxidative stress in rheumatoid arthritis. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0152925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Birch-Machin, M.A.; Bowman, A. Oxidative stress and ageing. Br. J. Dermatol. 2016, 175 (Suppl. 2), 26–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Halliwell, B.; Gutteridge, J.M. Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  9. Júnior, M.M.; de Oliveira, T.P.; Gonçalves, O.H.; Leimann, F.V.; Medeiros Marques, L.L.; Fuchs, R.H.B.; Cardoso, F.A.R.; Droval, A.A. Substitution of synthetic antioxidant by curcumin microcrystals in mortadella formulations. Food Chem. 2019, 300, 125231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Patil, B.S.; Jayaprakasha, G.K.; Chidambara Murthy, K.N.; Vikram, A. Bioactive compounds: Historical perspectives, opportunities, and challenges. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 8142–8160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Scalbert, A.; Johnson, I.T.; Saltmarsh, M. Polyphenols: Antioxidants and beyond. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2005, 81, 215S–217S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kris-Etherton, P.M.; Hecker, K.D.; Bonanome, A.; Coval, S.M.; Binkoski, A.E.; Hilpert, K.F.; Griel, A.E.; Etherton, T.D. Bioactive compounds in foods: Their role in the prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer. Am. J. Med. 2002, 113, 71–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Aruoma, O.I. Methodological considerations for characterizing potential antioxidant actions of bioactive components in plant foods. Mutat. Res./Fundam. Mol. Mech. Mutagen. 2003, 523–524, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Tavarini, S.; Degl’Innocenti, E.; Remorini, D.; Massai, R.; Guidi, L. Antioxidant capacity, ascorbic acid, total phenols and carotenoids changes during harvest and after storage of hayward kiwifruit. Food Chem. 2008, 107, 282–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Huang, Y.C.; Chang, Y.H.; Shao, Y.Y. Effects of genotype and treatment on the antioxidant activity of sweet potato in taiwan. Food Chem. 2006, 98, 529–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Clifford, M.N. Diet-derived phenols in plasma and tissues and their implications for health. Planta Med. 2004, 70, 1103–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Di Majo, D.; La Guardia, M.; Giammanco, S.; La Neve, L.; Giammanco, M. The antioxidant capacity of red wine in relationship with its polyphenolic constituents. Food Chem. 2008, 111, 45–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Royer, M.; Diouf, P.N.; Stevanovic, T. Polyphenol contents and radical scavenging capacities of red maple (Acer rubrum L.) extracts. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2011, 49, 2180–2188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sheabar, F.Z.; Neeman, I. Separation and concentration of natural antioxidants from the rape of olives. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1988, 65, 990–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Onyeneho, S.N.; Hettiarachchy, N.S. Antioxidant activity of durum wheat bran. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 40, 1496–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Marinova, E.; Yanishlieva, N.; Kostova, I. Antioxidative action of the ethanolic extract and some hydroxycoumarins of fraxinus ornus bark. Food Chem. 1994, 51, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sotillo, D.R.; Hadley, M.; Holm, E.T. Potato peel waste: Stability and antioxidant activity of a freeze-dried extract. J. Food Sci. 1994, 59, 1031–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Shen, J.; Zou, Z.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, L.; Wang, Y.; Fang, W.; Zhu, X. Metabolic analyses reveal different mechanisms of leaf color change in two purple-leaf tea plant (Camellia sinensis L.) cultivars. Hortic. Res. 2018, 5, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Zhao, M.-H.; Li, X.; Zhang, X.-X.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, X.-Y. Mutation mechanism of leaf color in plants: A review. Forests 2020, 11, 851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lu, X.; Chen, Z.; Gao, J.; Fu, S.; Hu, H.; Ren, J. Combined metabolome and transcriptome analyses of photosynthetic pigments in red maple. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 154, 476–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Awad, M.A.; Al-Qurashi, A.D.; Mohamed, S.A. Antioxidant capacity, antioxidant compounds and antioxidant enzyme activities in five date cultivars during development and ripening. Sci. Hortic. 2011, 129, 688–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zimmermann, P.; Zentgraf, U. The correlation between oxidative stress and leaf senescence during plant development. Cell Mol. Biol. Lett. 2005, 10, 515–534. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. Abou-Zaid, M.M.; Nozzolillo, C.; Tonon, A.; Coppens, M.; Lombardo, D.A. High-performance liquid chromatography characterization and identification of antioxidant polyphenols in maple syrup. Pharm. Biol. 2008, 46, 117–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Thériault, M.; Caillet, S.; Kermasha, S.; Lacroix, M. Antioxidant, antiradical and antimutagenic activities of phenolic compounds present in maple products. Food Chem. 2006, 98, 490–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Henry, G.E.; Yuan, T.; Edmonds, M.; Li, L.; Seeram, N.P. Antioxidant and α-glucosidase inhibitory activities of maple (Acer spp.) bark extracts. Planta Med. 2012, 78, PI375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Song, D.-H.; Gu, T.-W.; Kim, H.-W. Quality characteristics of senior-friendly gelatin gels formulated with hot water extract from red maple leaf as a novel anthocyanin source. Foods 2021, 10, 3074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Al-Farsi, M.; Alasalvar, C.; Morris, A.; Baron, M.; Shahidi, F. Comparison of antioxidant activity, anthocyanins, carotenoids, and phenolics of three native fresh and sun-dried date (Phoenix dactylifera L.) varieties grown in oman. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 7592–7599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Çam, M.; Hışıl, Y. Pressurised water extraction of polyphenols from pomegranate peels. Food Chem. 2010, 123, 878–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Roshanak, S.; Rahimmalek, M.; Goli, S.A. Evaluation of seven different drying treatments in respect to total flavonoid, phenolic, vitamin c content, chlorophyll, antioxidant activity and color of green tea (Camellia sinensis or C. assamica) leaves. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 53, 721–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Gross, J. Pigments in Vegetables: Chlorophylls and Carotenoids; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  36. Yen, G.C.; Chang, Y.C.; Su, S.W. Antioxidant activity and active compounds of rice koji fermented with Aspergillus candidus. Food Chem. 2003, 83, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tee, P.L.; Yusof, S.; Mohamed, S. Antioxidative properties of roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) in linoleic acid model system. Nutr. Food Sci. 2002, 32, 17–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Stoilova, I.; Krastanov, A.; Stoyanova, A.; Denev, P.; Gargova, S. Antioxidant activity of a ginger extract (Zingiber officinale). Food Chem. 2007, 102, 764–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. García-Alonso, M. Evaluation of the antioxidant properties of fruits. Food Chem. 2004, 84, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mensor, L.L.; Menezes, F.S.; Leitao, G.G.; Reis, A.S.; dos Santos, T.C.; Coube, C.S.; Leitao, S.G. Screening of brazilian plant extracts for antioxidant activity by the use of dpph free radical method. Phytother. Res. 2001, 15, 127–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Thaipong, K.; Boonprakob, U.; Crosby, K.; Cisneros-Zevallos, L.; Hawkins Byrne, D. Comparison of abts, dpph, frap, and orac assays for estimating antioxidant activity from guava fruit extracts. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2006, 19, 669–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Singh, N.; Rajini, P.S. Free radical scavenging activity of an aqueous extract of potato peel. Food Chem. 2004, 85, 611–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Jeong, S.Y.; Kim, E.; Zhang, M.; Lee, Y.-S.; Ji, B.; Lee, S.-H.; Cheong, Y.E.; Yun, S.-I.; Kim, Y.-S.; Kim, K.H.; et al. Antidiabetic effect of noodles containing fermented lettuce extracts. Metabolites 2021, 11, 520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Wu, H.; Southam, A.D.; Hines, A.; Viant, M.R. High-throughput tissue extraction protocol for nmr- and ms-based metabolomics. Anal. Biochem. 2008, 372, 204–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Shen, J.; Wang, Y.; Chen, C.; Ding, Z.; Hu, J.; Zheng, C.; Li, Y. Metabolite profiling of tea (Camellia sinensis L.) leaves in winter. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 192, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Styczynski, M.P.; Moxley, J.F.; Tong, L.V.; Walther, J.L.; Jensen, K.L.; Stephanopoulos, G.N. Systematic identification of conserved metabolites in gc/ms data for metabolomics and biomarker discovery. Anal. Chem. 2007, 79, 966–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Chen, Z.; Lu, X.; Xuan, Y.; Tang, F.; Wang, J.; Shi, D.; Fu, S.; Ren, J. Transcriptome analysis based on a combination of sequencing platforms provides insights into leaf pigmentation in acer rubrum. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Zhu, C.; Xiaoyu, L.; Junlan, G.; Yun, X.; Jie, R. Integrating transcriptomic and metabolomic analysis of hormone pathways in acer rubrum during developmental leaf senescence. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhang, M.; Bu, T.; Liu, S.; Kim, S. Optimization of caffeic acid extraction from dendropanax morbifera leaves using response surface methodology and determination of polyphenols and antioxidant properties. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bandici, L.; Teusdea, A.C.; Soproni, V.D.; Hathazi, F.I.; Arion, M.N.; Molnar, C.O.; Vicas, S.I. The influence of microwave treatments on bioactive compounds and antioxidant capacity of Mentha piperita L. Materials 2022, 15, 7789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gerami, M.; Majidian, P.; Ghorbanpour, A.; Alipour, Z. Stevia rebaudiana bertoni responses to salt stress and chitosan elicitor. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2020, 26, 965–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chaves, M.C.; Freitas, J.C.E.; Nery, F.C.; Paiva, R.; Prudente, D.d.O.; Costa, B.G.P.; Daubermann, A.G.; Bernardes, M.M.; Grazul, R.M. Influence of colorful light-emitting diodes on growth, biochemistry, and production of volatile organic compounds in vitro of lippia filifolia (verbenaceae). J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2020, 212, 112040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Thuraya, A.; Majeda, S.; Mariam, A. Rapid and nondestructive estimations of chlorophyll concentration in date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) leaflets using spad-502+ and ccm-200 portable chlorophyll meters. Emir. J. Food. Agric. 2021, 33, 544–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Espinosa-Acosta, G.; Ramos-Jacques, A.L.; Molina, G.A.; Maya-Cornejo, J.; Esparza, R.; Hernandez-Martinez, A.R.; Sánchez-González, I.; Estevez, M. Stability analysis of anthocyanins using alcoholic extracts from black carrot (Daucus carota ssp. Sativus var. Atrorubens alef.). Molecules 2018, 23, 2744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Li, W.; Beta, T. An evaluation of carotenoid levels and composition of glabrous canaryseed. Food Chem. 2012, 133, 782–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Alam, M.N.; Bristi, N.J.; Rafiquzzaman, M. Review on in vivo and in vitro methods evaluation of antioxidant activity. Saudi Pharm. J. 2013, 21, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Park, S.Y.; Jang, H.L.; Lee, J.H.; Choi, Y.; Kim, H.; Hwang, J.; Seo, D.; Kim, S.; Nam, J.S. Changes in the phenolic compounds and antioxidant activities of mustard leaf (Brassica juncea) kimchi extracts during different fermentation periods. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2017, 26, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Karawita, R.; Siriwardhana, N.; Lee, K.-W.; Heo, M.-S.; Yeo, I.-K.; Lee, Y.-D.; Jeon, Y.-J. Reactive oxygen species scavenging, metal chelation, reducing power and lipid peroxidation inhibition properties of different solvent fractions from Hizikia fusiformis. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2004, 220, 363–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Albayrak, S.; Aksoy, A.; Sagdic, O.; Albayrak, S. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of different extracts of some medicinal herbs consumed as tea and spices in turkey. J. Food Biochem. 2012, 36, 547–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Shah, P.; Modi, H. Comparative study of dpph, abts and frap assays for determination of antioxidant activity. Int. J. Res. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2015, 3, 636–641. [Google Scholar]
  61. Lv, H.P.; Zhang, Y.; Shi, J.; Lin, Z. Phytochemical profiles and antioxidant activities of chinese dark teas obtained by different processing technologies. Food Res. Int. 2017, 100, 486–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ma, C.; Wang, Z.Q.; Kong, B.B.; Lin, T.B. Exogenous trehalose differentially modulate antioxidant defense system in wheat callus during water deficit and subsequent recovery. Plant Growth Regul. 2013, 70, 275–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Den Hartog, G.J.; Boots, A.W.; Adam-Perrot, A.; Brouns, F.; Verkooijen, I.W.; Weseler, A.R.; Haenen, G.R.; Bast, A. Erythritol is a sweet antioxidant. Nutrition 2010, 26, 449–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Msomi, N.Z.; Erukainure, O.L.; Salau, V.F.; Olofinsan, K.A.; Islam, M.S. Xylitol improves antioxidant, purinergic and cholinergic dysfunction, and lipid metabolic homeostasis in hepatic injury in type 2 diabetic rats. J. Food Biochem. 2022, 46, e14040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Akbaribazm, M.; Khazaei, M.R.; Khazaei, M. Phytochemicals and antioxidant activity of alcoholic/hydroalcoholic extract of trifolium pratense. Chin. Herb. Med. 2020, 12, 326–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Lakshmi, S.A.; Bhaskar, J.P.; Krishnan, V.; Sethupathy, S.; Pandipriya, S.; Aruni, W.; Pandian, S.K. Inhibition of biofilm and biofilm-associated virulence factor production in methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus by docosanol. J. Biotechnol. 2020, 317, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Sánchez-Hidalgo, M.; León-González, A.J.; Gálvez-Peralta, M.; González-Mauraza, N.H.; Martin-Cordero, C. D-pinitol: A cyclitol with versatile biological and pharmacological activities. Phytochem. Rev. 2020, 20, 211–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Islam, M.T.; Ali, E.S.; Uddin, S.J.; Shaw, S.; Islam, M.A.; Ahmed, M.I.; Chandra Shill, M.; Karmakar, U.K.; Yarla, N.S.; Khan, I.N.; et al. Phytol: A review of biomedical activities. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2018, 121, 82–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Paniagua-Perez, R.; Madrigal-Bujaidar, E.; Reyes-Cadena, S.; Alvarez-Gonzalez, I.; Sanchez-Chapul, L.; Perez-Gallaga, J.; Hernandez, N.; Flores-Mondragon, G.; Velasco, O. Cell protection induced by beta-sitosterol: Inhibition of genotoxic damage, stimulation of lymphocyte production, and determination of its antioxidant capacity. Arch. Toxicol. 2008, 82, 615–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Matysik, J.; Alia; Bhalu, B.; Mohanty, P. Molecular mechanisms of quenching of reactive oxygen species by proline under stress in plants. Curr. Sci. 2002, 82, 525–532. [Google Scholar]
  71. Lee, H.J.; Lee, J.H.; Wi, S.; Jang, Y.; An, S.; Choi, C.K.; Jang, S. Exogenously applied glutamic acid confers improved yield through increased photosynthesis efficiency and antioxidant defense system under chilling stress condition in solanum lycopersicum l. Cv. Dotaerang dia. Sci. Hortic. 2021, 277, 109817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Li, M.F.; Guo, S.J.; Yang, X.H.; Meng, Q.W.; Wei, X.J. Exogenous gamma-aminobutyric acid increases salt tolerance of wheat by improving photosynthesis and enhancing activities of antioxidant enzymes. Biol. Plant. 2016, 60, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Sato, Y.; Itagaki, S.; Kurokawa, T.; Ogura, J.; Kobayashi, M.; Hirano, T.; Sugawara, M.; Iseki, K. In vitro and in vivo antioxidant properties of chlorogenic acid and caffeic acid. Int. J. Pharm. 2011, 403, 136–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Wang, Z.J.; Liang, C.L.; Li, G.M.; Yu, C.Y.; Yin, M. Stearic acid protects primary cultured cortical neurons against oxidative stress. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2007, 28, 315–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Arrigoni, O.; De Tullio, M.C. Ascorbic acid: Much more than just an antioxidant. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gen. Subj. 2002, 1569, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Lu, J.; You, L.; Lin, Z.; Zhao, M.; Cui, C. The antioxidant capacity of polysaccharide fromlaminaria japonicaby citric acid extraction. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 48, 1352–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Linker, R.A.; Lee, D.H.; Ryan, S.; van Dam, A.M.; Conrad, R.; Bista, P.; Zeng, W.; Hronowsky, X.; Buko, A.; Chollate, S.; et al. Fumaric acid esters exert neuroprotective effects in neuroinflammation via activation of the nrf2 antioxidant pathway. Brain 2011, 134, 678–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Wang, J.; Cao, X.; Jiang, H.; Qi, Y.; Chin, K.L.; Yue, Y. Antioxidant activity of leaf extracts from different hibiscus sabdariffa accessions and simultaneous determination five major antioxidant compounds by lc-q-tof-ms. Molecules 2014, 19, 21226–21238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Badhani, B.; Sharma, N.; Kakkar, R. Gallic acid: A versatile antioxidant with promising therapeutic and industrial applications. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 27540–27557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Par, A.; Mezes, M.; Nemeth, P.; Javor, T. Effects of cianidanol on the blood lipid peroxide status in patients with chronic hepatitis. Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Res. 1985, 5, 389–397. [Google Scholar]
  81. Engin, K.N. Alpha-tocopherol: Looking beyond an antioxidant. Mol. Vis. 2009, 15, 855–860. [Google Scholar]
  82. Wagner, K.H.; Kamal-Eldin, A.; Elmadfa, I. Gamma-tocopherol—An underestimated vitamin? Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2004, 48, 169–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Estevez, A.M.; Estevez, R.J. A short overview on the medicinal chemistry of (-)-shikimic acid. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2012, 12, 1443–1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Blasco, H.; Patin, F.; Descat, A.; Garçon, G.; Corcia, P.; Gelé, P.; Lenglet, T.; Bede, P.; Meininger, V.; Devos, D.; et al. A pharmaco-metabolomics approach in a clinical trial of als: Identification of predictive markers of progression. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0198116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Krishnaiah, D.; Sarbatly, R.; Nithyanandam, R. A review of the antioxidant potential of medicinal plant species. Food Bioprod. Process. 2011, 89, 217–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Teleszko, M.; Wojdyło, A. Comparison of phenolic compounds and antioxidant potential between selected edible fruits and their leaves. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 14, 736–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Subramanion, L.J.; Zakaria, Z.; Sreenivasan, S. Phytochemicals screening, dpph free radical scavenging and xanthine oxidase inhibitiory activities of cassia fistula seeds extract. J. Med. Plants Res. 2011, 5, 1941–1947. [Google Scholar]
  88. Sreenivasan, S.; Ibrahim, D.; MOHD KASSIM, M.J.N. Free radical scavenging activity and total phenolic compounds of gracilaria changii. Int. J. Nat. Eng. Sci. 2007, 1, 115–117. [Google Scholar]
  89. Srianta, I.; Arisasmita, J.; Patria, H.; Epriliati, I. Ethnobotany, nutritional composition and dpph radical scavenging of leafy vegetables of wild paederia foetida and erechtites hieracifolia. Int. Food Res. J. 2012, 19, 245. [Google Scholar]
  90. Gupta, S.; Prakash, J. Studies on indian green leafy vegetables for their antioxidant activity. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2009, 64, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Surinut, P.; Kaewsutthi, S.; Surakarnkul, R. Radical Scavenging Activity in Fruit Extracts; International Society for Horticultural Science (ISHS): Leuven, Belgium, 2005; pp. 201–203. [Google Scholar]
  92. Schaberg, P.G.; Murakami, P.F.; Turner, M.R.; Heitz, H.K.; Hawley, G.J. Association of red coloration with senescence of sugar maple leaves in autumn. Trees 2008, 22, 573–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Hu, B.; Lai, B.; Wang, D.; Li, J.; Chen, L.; Qin, Y.; Wang, H.; Qin, Y.; Hu, G.; Zhao, J. Three lcabfs are involved in the regulation of chlorophyll degradation and anthocyanin biosynthesis during fruit ripening in litchi chinensis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2019, 60, 448–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Lee, D.W.; O’Keefe, J.; Holbrook, N.M.; Feild, T.S. Pigment dynamics and autumn leaf senescence in a new england deciduous forest, eastern USA. Ecol. Res. 2003, 18, 677–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Renner, S.S.; Zohner, C.M. The occurrence of red and yellow autumn leaves explained by regional differences in insolation and temperature. New Phytol. 2019, 224, 1464–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Hortensteiner, S. Chlorophyll degradation during senescence. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2006, 57, 55–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Hoch, W.A.; Zeldin, E.L.; McCown, B.H. Physiological significance of anthocyanins during autumnal leaf senescence. Tree Physiol. 2001, 21, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Cao, H.B.; Wang, J.B.; Dong, X.T.; Han, Y.; Ma, Q.L.; Ding, Y.D.; Zhao, F.; Zhang, J.C.; Chen, H.J.; Xu, Q.; et al. Carotenoid accumulation affects redox status, starch metabolism, and flavonoid/anthocyanin accumulation in citrus. BMC Plant Biol. 2015, 15, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Anderson, R.; Ryser, P. Early autumn senescence in red maple (Acer rubrum L.) is associated with high leaf anthocyanin content. Plants 2015, 4, 505–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Hou, J.; Liang, L.; Su, M.; Yang, T.; Mao, X.; Wang, Y. Variations in phenolic acids and antioxidant activity of navel orange at different growth stages. Food Chem. 2021, 360, 129980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Sharkey, T.D. Pentose phosphate pathway reactions in photosynthesizing cells. Cells 2021, 10, 1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Suárez, S.; Mu, T.; Sun, H.; Añón, M.C. Antioxidant activity, nutritional, and phenolic composition of sweet potato leaves as affected by harvesting period. Int. J. Food Prop. 2020, 23, 178–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Kisa, D.; İmamoğlu, R.; Genç, N.; Şahin, S.; Qayyum, M.A.; Elmastaş, M. The interactive effect of aromatic amino acid composition on the accumulation of phenolic compounds and the expression of biosynthesis-related genes in ocimum basilicum. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2021, 27, 2057–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Antioxidants 12 00065 g001 550
Figure 1. Maple leaves of different colors in Jeonju University.
Figure 1. Maple leaves of different colors in Jeonju University.
Antioxidants 12 00065 g001
Antioxidants 12 00065 g002 550
Figure 2. In vitro antioxidant properties of maple leaves of different colors. (a) Dose-dependent TBARS absorbance values of maple leaves of different colors; (b) Dose-dependent DPPH scavenging ability of maple leaves of different colors and ascorbic acid; (c) FRAP value of maple leaves of different colors; (d) Dose-dependent metal ions chelation capability of maple leaves of different colors and EDTA. AAE, ascorbic acid equivalents; DW, dry weight.
Figure 2. In vitro antioxidant properties of maple leaves of different colors. (a) Dose-dependent TBARS absorbance values of maple leaves of different colors; (b) Dose-dependent DPPH scavenging ability of maple leaves of different colors and ascorbic acid; (c) FRAP value of maple leaves of different colors; (d) Dose-dependent metal ions chelation capability of maple leaves of different colors and EDTA. AAE, ascorbic acid equivalents; DW, dry weight.
Antioxidants 12 00065 g002
Antioxidants 12 00065 g003 550
Figure 3. Correlation coefficients of antioxidant activities and polyphenol content. The numbers in the lower triangular represent correlation values; positive values mean positive correlation, whereas negative values mean negative correlation. In the upper triangular, dark red represents significant positive correlation; dark blue means significant negative correlation, and the numbers signify the p value (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Correlation coefficients of antioxidant activities and polyphenol content. The numbers in the lower triangular represent correlation values; positive values mean positive correlation, whereas negative values mean negative correlation. In the upper triangular, dark red represents significant positive correlation; dark blue means significant negative correlation, and the numbers signify the p value (p < 0.05).
Antioxidants 12 00065 g003
Antioxidants 12 00065 g004 550
Figure 4. PCA score scatter plot of maple leaves with different colors. Each point on the PCA score scatter plot represents a sample, and each color represents a different color of maple leaves.
Figure 4. PCA score scatter plot of maple leaves with different colors. Each point on the PCA score scatter plot represents a sample, and each color represents a different color of maple leaves.
Antioxidants 12 00065 g004
Antioxidants 12 00065 g005 550
Figure 5. Heatmap from hierarchical clustering analysis (HCA) of maple leaves with different colors.
Figure 5. Heatmap from hierarchical clustering analysis (HCA) of maple leaves with different colors.
Antioxidants 12 00065 g005
Table
Table 1. Total content of different polyphenols.
Table 1. Total content of different polyphenols.
TP
(mg GAE/g)		TET
(mg GAE/g)		TFlav
(mg QE/g)		Chl a
(mg/g)		Chl b
(mg/g)		TAN
(mg/100 g)		TAC
(mg/100 g)
Green49.66 ± 2.50 a39.96 ± 2.65 b17.50 ± 0.87 c1.49 ± 0.112 a0.82 ± 0.12 aN.D.0.21 ± 0.01 c
Yellow69.05 ± 3.59 b57.41 ± 3.65 a29.60 ± 1.00 b0.24 ± 0.01 b0.33 ± 0.02 b0.02 ± 0.002 b0.28 ± 0.01 b
Red106.43 ± 3.83 c57.97 ± 3.59 a47.48 ± 1.11 a0.03 ± 0.01 c0.10 ± 0.02 c0.07 ± 0.002 a0.71 ± 0.01 a
Data are expressed as the mean of triplicate analyses ± standard deviation, with different superscripts indicating significant differences between the means (p < 0.05). TP, total phenol; TET, total extractable tannin; TFlav, total flavonoid; Chl a, chlorophyll a; Chl b, chlorophyll b; TAN, total anthocyanins; TAC, total carotenoids; N.D., not detected.
Table
Table 2. List of identified metabolites.
Table 2. List of identified metabolites.
SchemeCompound NameMolecular Formulap ValueFDRMaximum ValueMinimum ValueAntioxidant &
References
Sugars and sugar
alcohols
(10)		D-GlucoseC6H12O6<0.05<0.05RedGreen
D-FructoseC6H12O6<0.05<0.05RedGreen
SucroseC12H22O11<0.05<0.05GreenRed &
Yellow
TrehaloseC12H22O11<0.05<0.05GreenYellow△[62]
D-GalactoseC6H12O60.25200.2617RedYellow
D-RiboseC5H10O5<0.05<0.05YellowGreen
InositolC6H12O6<0.05<0.05GreenRed
ErythritolC4H10O4<0.05<0.05YellowGreen & Red▲[63]
SorbitanC6H12O5<0.05<0.05GreenYellow
XylitolC5H12O5<0.05<0.05YellowRed△[64]
alcohol, Fatty alcohol
and
phytosterols (8)		1-HexadecanolC16H34O<0.05<0.05YellowRed▲[65]
DocosanolC22H46O0.30030.3060RedYellow▲[66]
GlycerolC3H8O3<0.05<0.05GreenRed
Stearyl alcoholC18H38O<0.05<0.05GreenRed
D-PinitolC7H14O6<0.05<0.05GreenYellow▲[67]
PhytolC20H40O<0.05<0.05YellowRed▲[68]
(2,3,4,5,6-Pentahydroxycyclohexyl) dihydrogen phosphateC6H13O9P<0.05<0.05GreenRed
β-SitosterolC29H50O0.06550.0722GreenRed▲[69]
Amino
acid
(13)		AlanineC3H7NO2<0.05<0.05GreenRed
Aspartic acidC4H7NO4<0.05<0.05GreenRed
LeucineC6H13NO2<0.05<0.05GreenRed
PhenylalanineC9H11NO2<0.05<0.05GreenRed
ProlineC5H9NO2<0.05<0.05YellowRed▲[70]
Pyroglutamic AcidC5H7NO3<0.05<0.05YellowRed
SerineC3H7NO3<0.05<0.05YellowRed
ThreonineC4H9NO3<0.05<0.05GreenRed
TyrosineC9H11NO3<0.05<0.05GreenRed
ValineC5H11NO2<0.05<0.05GreenRed
L-GlutamateC5H9NO4<0.05<0.05GreenRed△[71]
GlycineC2H5NO2<0.05<0.05GreenRed
γ-Aminobutyric acidC4H9NO2<0.05<0.05GreenRed▲[72]
Organic acid
(14)		Malic acidC4H6O5<0.05<0.05YellowRed
2-Keto-gluconateC6H10O7<0.05<0.05GreenYellow
3-Hydroxypropionic acidC3H6O3<0.05<0.05GreenYellow
Lactic acidC3H6O30.14330.1517YellowRed
Palmitic acidC16H32O2<0.05<0.05GreenRed
Quinic acidC7H12O6<0.05<0.05YellowRed△[73]
sn-Glycerol 3-phosphateC3H9O6P<0.05<0.05GreenRed
Stearic acidC18H36O20.587220.58722GreenYellow△[74]
Succinic acidC4H6O4<0.05<0.05GreenRed
Ascorbic acidC6H8O6<0.05<0.05RedYellow▲[75]
Citric acidC6H8O7<0.05<0.05GreenRed△[76]
Glyceric acidC3H6O4<0.05<0.05YellowRed
Erythronic acidC4H8O5<0.05<0.05GreenRed
Fumaric acidC4H4O4<0.05<0.05GreenYellow△[77]
Polyphenols
and
Phenolic acids
(7)		Cryptochlorogenic acidC16H18O9<0.05<0.05YellowGreen▲[78]
Gallic acidC7H6O5<0.05<0.05RedGreen▲[79]
Neochlorogenic acidC16H18O9<0.05<0.05RedGreen▲[78]
CianidanolC15H14O6<0.05<0.05RedYellow▲[80]
α-TocopherolC29H50O2<0.05<0.05RedGreen▲[81]
γ-TocopherolC28H48O2<0.05<0.05YellowGreen▲[82]
Shikimic acidC7H10O5<0.05<0.05RedGreen▲[83]
Others
(2)		Phosphoric acidH3PO4<0.05<0.05GreenRed
UreaCH4N2O0.11010.1189YellowRed
Note: FDR: False Discovery Rate. △: metabolites related to antioxidant activity. ▲: metabolites with antioxidant activity.
Table
Table 3. List of twenty metabolites with high absolute loading values on PC 1 and PC 2.
Table 3. List of twenty metabolites with high absolute loading values on PC 1 and PC 2.
PC 1PC 2
MetabolitesLoadings ScoresMetabolitesLoadings Scores
Succinic acid0.188Erythritol0.262
Inositol0.184γ-Tocopherol0.26
Phenylalanine0.183Phytol0.259
Glycerol0.182Quinic acid0.231
Glycine0.181Malic acid0.229
D-Fructose−0.1791-Hexadecanol0.209
Erythronic acid0.179Proline0.202
Aspartic acid0.178Serine0.195
Shikimic acid−0.178Cryptochlorogenic acid0.195
Citric acid0.177D-Pinitol−0.188
Valine0.176Trehalose−0.187
Glutamic acid0.174D-Ribose0.184
D-Glucose−0.174Fumaric acid−0.175
Threonine0.173Sorbitan−0.174
Neochlorogenic acid−0.1732-Keto-gluconate−0.163
Alanine0.172Urea0.159
Tyrosine0.171Glyceric acid0.158
Leucine0.168Xylitol0.156
Stearyl alcohol0.168Pyroglutamic Acid0.156
Phosphoric acid0.167Cianidanol−0.144
Note: Loadings scores were obtained by PCA analysis, presenting data as the 20 with the largest absolute values in the loading values, and data analysis was analyzed in Metaboanalyst.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, M.; Choe, J.; Bu, T.; Liu, S.; Kim, S. Comparison of Antioxidant Properties and Metabolite Profiling of Acer pseudoplatanus Leaves of Different Colors. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12010065

AMA Style

Zhang M, Choe J, Bu T, Liu S, Kim S. Comparison of Antioxidant Properties and Metabolite Profiling of Acer pseudoplatanus Leaves of Different Colors. Antioxidants. 2023; 12(1):65. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12010065

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Ming, Jeehwan Choe, Ting Bu, Shuilin Liu, and Sooah Kim. 2023. "Comparison of Antioxidant Properties and Metabolite Profiling of Acer pseudoplatanus Leaves of Different Colors" Antioxidants 12, no. 1: 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12010065

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop