RE: Rover 216 Coupé | Spotted

RE: Rover 216 Coupé | Spotted

Wednesday 16th March 2022

Rover 216 Coupé | Spotted

Join us on memory lane with where there's nothing to worry about (except rust)



The Rover name and the Longbridge plant may be long gone, but isn't that even more reason to keep the flame alive and a watchful eye on the models it once produced? I find myself checking regularly in the hope of spotting a Rover SD1 in the PH Classifieds, but, so far, I have drawn a blank. However, en route to that failure, I did spot this Rover 216 Coupé in a very fetching shade of what, I think, was the metallic take on British Racing Green. Answers on a postcard if you wish to challenge that.

I know, I know; a 216 Coupé isn't the most sought-after model in the world - or even in Rover world, for that matter ­- but back in the day I always admired the 200 Coupé, or Tomcat, as it was unofficially known. Naturally, I'd have been even happier had I struck upon a Turbo, but when you're searching for teeth among a brood of hens, beggars cannot be choosers.

The 200 Coupé was launched at the Paris Motor Show back in 1992 (there's 30 years that have vanished in a flash). Almost every body panel on the coupé was changed over the 200 hatch and 400 saloon it was based on, in the process creating the clean silhouette you see here. I would argue it's aged mightily well considering.


You also got a T-bar roof, which consisted of two glass panels that hinged open or could be removed entirely, along with the central support bar, creating a semi-open cockpit. That gave the car a USP to draw buyers away from rivals like the Calibra and Corrado, which just offered a sunroof. The glass panels were coated with titanium, so when the panels were in place, reputedly, this reflected 94 per cent of the sun's heat and did away with the need for blinds.

I think it's fair to say this 216 Coupé wears its 79,000 miles extremely well. It's a one-owner car and the claim in the blurb that he or she looked after it 'meticulously' stands up in the photos. The paintwork it lustrous and those pretty, seven-spoke alloys aren't blistered - just some minor kerb damage on the rims. Looking inside, I've decided that the previous owner was in fact a ghost, because it looks untouched. The leather-trimmed steering wheel is unworn, as is the gear knob. And another thing: how many massively expensive Fords from this period do you see with sagging velour seat trim? I see many, but here the part-velour and cloth upholstery looks taut and fresh - even the driver's seat bolster appears unmarked.

Being a 216 you're not going to be overawed by its performance but, according to my research, the D16A8 twin-cam developed 122hp. This meant 0-60mph in 9.5 seconds, which is far from sluggish. Plus, it's a Honda lump, so it should be as reliable as the Changing of the Guard. That said, Honda's D-Series motor is still known for head gasket failures, so if you thought avoiding the later 1.6-litre K-Series engine, which arrived in 1996, would save you that pain, that's far from guaranteed.


That advice came direct from the Rover Coupé Owner's Club, and the other things it says to watch for include rust (of course): check the sills, rear wings, bottom corners of doors, wheel arches, leading edge of windscreen and around the rear lights. Also, the seat bolsters commonly wear (again, that's why this car looks like a good'un), and check that the rear number plate lights work, because the wiring loom between the body and the boot lid fails. It's also worth checking the suspension bushes - front anti-roll bar drop links and rear trailing arm bushes particularly.

Now, I dare say a few PHers will be eyeing up an open-top car for the upcoming summer. At a snip under £5,000 for this car in this condition, don't you reckon it's an interesting potential purchase? Okay, it's not fast and there are better-handling cars, but does any of that matter? After all, pretty much everything that's 30-years old feels slow and wobbly compared with what we have now. So if you're still sneering at the back, stop it. This is a genuinely handsome car with open-top versatility, and it really isn't expensive. I reckon that makes it well worth a punt.


Specification | Rover 216 Coupé

Engine: 1,590cc, 4-cylinder, naturally aspirated
Transmission: 5-speed manual, front-wheel drive
Power (hp): 122 @ 6,800rpm
Torque (lb ft): 108 @ 5,900rpm
CO2: N/A
MPG: N/A
Recorded mileage: 79,000
Year registered: 1994
Price new: £14,496
Yours for: £4,950

See the full ad here




Author
Discussion

Rostyle

Original Poster:

48 posts

76 months

Wednesday 16th March 2022
quotequote all
My then company back in the 90s only bought Rovers as company cars ( patriots eh , what fools) , I was given one of these exact cars for 6 months in a fetching metallic blue . After the CVT bubble shaped 200 I had previously it was a blessed relief . It was a great car , ride was a bit harsh but otherwise for a young guy it was just great and seemed nippy enough . I seemed to remember it was built well and could carry 4 easily . I think this is a relative bargain , I wouldn't mind driving it now to see if I'm looking through rose tinted spex . It still looks good too .

dunnoreally

979 posts

109 months

Wednesday 16th March 2022
quotequote all
Nearly bought one of these for somewhere around £600 when I was 19.

It is a shame that today's 19 year olds can no longer get mildly interesting cars for somewhere around £600.

andy97

4,704 posts

223 months

Wednesday 16th March 2022
quotequote all
I have a feeling that that particular generation of 200 series Rover chassis was very closely related to the DC2 Honda Integra and therefore handled very well.

ducnick

1,800 posts

244 months

Wednesday 16th March 2022
quotequote all
Perfect car for the festival of the unexceptional. Come on PH cross link your stories.
https://www.pistonheads.com/news/general-pistonhea...

TRIUMPHBULLET

701 posts

114 months

Wednesday 16th March 2022
quotequote all
Not the most torsionally rigid 200, I bought a 97 Rover k series 216 coupe for the wife in 2000, full dealer service history. The colour was Amaranth and it did look good.
Biggest crock of crap we have ever had, head gasket had to be done twice in the 18 months we had it, the tyres kept going down (crap porous alloy wheels) it felt shoddily built yet the excellent 1991 216 GSI we had before felt like it had been built by a different company, in a way I suppose it was.

Miserablegit

4,029 posts

110 months

Wednesday 16th March 2022
quotequote all
I nearly bought a used "Tomcat" 2.0 Turbo version back in 1998.
It was a few years old, was about £5000 and the insurance was £5000 as well so I bought a classic instead. I'm sure I'd have done myself a mischief with the 2.0 turbo

J4CKO

41,676 posts

201 months

Wednesday 16th March 2022
quotequote all
I had a 216 Auto in a more Kermitty shade of green, was a stopgap car so only had it a few months but it was really quite nice, sold it and years later I saw it trundle past on the M6. My dad had a blue manual one for a couple of years as well.

5 grand seems a lot but these days, it isnt for a nice looking example of what is a fairly unusual car nowadays.

Didnt the coupe have different rear suspension to the saloons etc ?

Remember also a posh old lady my mother in law knew turning up for drinks in one, I clocked it and realised it was a turbo, her husband said they had it in stock, was the right colour and did a good deal, dont think they realised quite what they had bought.

cerb4.5lee

30,822 posts

181 months

Wednesday 16th March 2022
quotequote all
I've always loved the shape of these, and my BIL had the same model as this one. I was expecting it to be absolutely gutless to drive, but it was strangely quite willing to rev and it didn't feel anywhere near as bad as I was expecting. I was secretly impressed with it.

I'd happily have this for nostalgia purposes. cool

Nu57jez9639

803 posts

39 months

Wednesday 16th March 2022
quotequote all
Having worked for an ex Rover Foundry for many years I was entitled to staff discount etc which I think was roughly a third then if any offers on top we could get a brand new car for nearly half price, the 220 turbo in 14 years was the only car I looked into buying after using a managers for the day.

When I looked into buying the tomcat 220 turbo not a single.dealer after trying 6 had 1 brand new unregistered However 1 had a car which was about a year old in the dimwit salesman could not get his head round why I didn't want it as I stated to him not entitled to use my staff discount etc on a used car so it's going to cost me more for a second hand car in the end I bought a 14 months old Audi A4 1.8T sport.

wpa1975

8,872 posts

115 months

Wednesday 16th March 2022
quotequote all
I had a later one of these with the 1.6 K series engine, it was a nice drive but the roof panels leaked badly and then the head gasket let go, I think I got about £400 for it.

LeeM135i

596 posts

55 months

Wednesday 16th March 2022
quotequote all
Had a 220 turbo back in the day with a remap and a few other under the bonnet mods, it flew in a straight line but with a load of toque steer and understeer in the corners it was very lively. I P/Xed it for a 200BRM which handled better but wasn't as fast. One of the lads at the dealer I P/Xed it at bought it and wrapped it round a tree.

They were really nice looking things (in my eyes) and the styling was ahead of its time. If I had another space in the garage I would be tempted with one of these or a BRM.

aestivator

240 posts

31 months

Wednesday 16th March 2022
quotequote all
So it's an extremely well-looked-after turd.

rampageturke

2,622 posts

163 months

Wednesday 16th March 2022
quotequote all
aestivator said:
So it's an extremely well-looked-after turd.
95% of what people consider to be classics are just that.

andymadmak

14,609 posts

271 months

Wednesday 16th March 2022
quotequote all
Borrowed one of these ( but a 220 Turbo version) for a track day at Donnington Park once. It actually handled reasonably well given the power that was going through the front wheels. I think it had a Torsen diff and that certainly helped. I did manage to shred the from tyres by the end of a very enthusiastic days thrashing!
In a straight line it was fantastic, and easily kept up with the Sierra Cosworths on the day. Build quality was nice too. I remember the paint and panel fit looked nice and tight, especially compared to the Ford/Vauxhall/Alfa stuff of the same period. A friend had a Nissan 300ZX, also with the lift out roof panels and the Tomcat ran rings round it, despite being a much cheaper car.
Would I buy this? No. But for what it is, from the time it was built, it's quite a nice car.

clacs2

312 posts

160 months

Wednesday 16th March 2022
quotequote all
aestivator said:
So it's an extremely well-looked-after turd.
By some metrics, by 2022 standards, yes.

That's not why you buy one. Its not why I bought any of my cars or bikes. I bought them because they offer a sense of mechanical connection that is missing from most affordable modern cars. There are many other reasons of course, and they are mainly subjective anyway. It's a broad church.

BigChiefmuffinAgain

1,071 posts

99 months

Wednesday 16th March 2022
quotequote all
Pretty thing but seriously - would anyone really part with that sort of money for it ? What would you want it for ???

Jon_S_Rally

3,424 posts

89 months

Wednesday 16th March 2022
quotequote all
Not a particularly desirable version of the line-up, but I always thought they were quite a nice looking car. It's probably not very quick, but I briefly owned a Civic Coupe SR a few years ago which I guess would have had much the same engine, and it was better than I expected.

aestivator said:
So it's an extremely well-looked-after turd.
Isn't that 90% of the classic car world? People don't buy classic cars for how "good" they necessarily are. They buy them because they want one.

mooseracer

1,911 posts

171 months

Wednesday 16th March 2022
quotequote all
andy97 said:
I have a feeling that that particular generation of 200 series Rover chassis was very closely related to the DC2 Honda Integra and therefore handled very well.
At best a very tenuous link to the Integra.

For their time these, and the hatchbacks, were a decent option and this one still looks good today.

Dr Interceptor

7,804 posts

197 months

Wednesday 16th March 2022
quotequote all
article tagline said:
Join us on memory lane with where there's nothing to worry about (except rust)
I've read that three times, and am still struggling

austinsmirk

5,597 posts

124 months

Wednesday 16th March 2022
quotequote all
Bizarrely I saw a white one yesterday which was a rare spot.

Looked as rubbish in 2022 as it did in the 90’s.