Where Are The Buicks Of Yesteryear? They're Here — With Pictures

by Ur-Turn

Published: October 23rd, 2013

where are the buicks of yesteryear they re here with pictures

Please welcome Jeff Stork, who comes to us from The Brougham Society with this story of an auto show and a young GM district manager, along with some great pictures. Check out his blog and Facebook page! — JB

In January of 1988, I was in my first year as the Buick Milwaukee District Sales Manager, aka “Factory Rep,” a job that entailed many tasks. Although it was primarily about obtaining enough orders to keep the factory churning- which could be a real task in a Wisconsin winter- there were numerous special assignments, one being the Milwaukee Auto Show.

Today, GM Auto Shows are handled by a team out of Detroit, but back then the responsibility fell to the sales and service reps. My sales counterpart and I (who had the other half of the state) scheduled a meeting with the Milwaukee Sales Managers we and ordered the cars — looking for the right balance of models, equipment, and colors to highlight the new 1988 Buicks. We sought input from the dealers but edited some of their ideas. The service reps supervised the preparation of the show cars and then when it came time to move in, we all worked side by side.

The manager of Rank and Son Buick, a large downtown dealer, insisted that we order a Park Avenue in Platinum Beige with a red leather interior and a dark maroon top. We were skeptical, so we also ordered a back-up car in tone-on-tone Rosewood. When finally saw the car, it looked pink- there was some red in the Platinum Beige paint formula that the red leather picked up and accentuated. We were pretty shocked and ended up using the back-up car, so the pink one became the property of the dealer who suggested it.

And it’s worth remembering at the line itself had undergone a massive transition in a few short years. In 1981, there was only one Buick with front wheel drive- the Riviera luxury coupe, but by 1988 only the Estate Wagon was RWD — and the balance of the entire line were unibody FWD offerings.

It’s a great snapshot of the 1988 Buick line- a sporty Skyhawk coupe, a sensible Skylark sedan and a Quad 4 Skylark Limited coupe with composite headlamps, a two-tone Century Limited sedan and a price leader four-cylinder Custom, the all new W-Body Regal coupe was represented by a black Custom, a ruby red Limited and a white Z-13 Sport Coupe which was rechristened Gran Sport about the same time as the show opening. Leather had just been released for the Le Sabre Limited so we showed one, we put cloth in a tone-on-tone Rosewood Park Avenue and displayed a Platinum Beige Riviera with the new factory Landau top.

There were two brand new Reattas in the display- the turntable car was shipped in from Flint and the floor car was being used by the zone for sales training, so I drove it around the week before the show and the week after. I literally drove it to the Convention Center for set-up day, and then drove it right on in to the Buick exhibit. I was detailing the wheel wells when I looked over my shoulder and there was a Channel 5 cameraman. I immediately turned back to detailing.

These pictures were taken on set-up day, about two hours before the black tie charity reception that takes place the night before the show opens- that’s why there aren’t any people in the exhibit. My boss, the Assistant Zone Manager, asked me to document the exhibit for the Zone Manager who was traveling. All of the reps a great deal of pride in the exhibit. We were pretty much allowed to create and staff it on our own, so I made sure we all got a set of the prints. It’s hard for me to believe that this was twenty-five years ago.

Ur-Turn

More by Ur-Turn

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 120 comments

Chicagoland on Oct 24, 2013

Buicks today are may more competitive than the 'good old' 1988 line up. The H body LeSabre did sell well, but the ancient Century contributed to 'old fogie' image. Sure, easy sell to old timers, but then who replaced the buyers after they passed? Led to bankruptcy If it were not for China, Buick would be deader than Plymouth. Finally, the current Opel/China based cars appeal to younger buyers, aged around 40-50, not 80-85! Just kidding, after the new Lacrosse, Regal, and Enclave were brought out, the Buick exhibits had actual 30-40 year old people looking at the cars.

Like Reply
RatherhaveaBuick on Oct 25, 2013

Lotta bashing of the 80s/90s era Buicks on here but the fact is they were reliable cars. Comfortable and understated, dependable and clean looking. Good sleepers too. And nowadays the old ones make good beaters/daily drivers for college students. I'm 22 and plan on buying used cars that were previously owned by the elderly for as long as I can...they're always taken care of the best. There is still life in Buick, still nice current products, but its just a different company now...its all global...can't compare it to the "old days". Regardless, my mom loves her Verano and she drove Volvos before it...

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Bouzouki Cadillac (aka GM!!) made so many mistakes over the past 40 years, right up to today, one could make a MBA course of it. Others have alluded to them, there is not enough room for me to recite them in a flowing, cohesive manner.Cadillac today is literally a tarted-up Chevrolet. They are nice cars, and the "aura" of the Cadillac name still works on several (mostly female) consumers who are not car enthusiasts.The CT4 and CT5 offer superlative ride and handling, and even performance--but, it is wrapped in sheet metal that (at least I think) looks awful, with (still) sub-par interiors. They are niche cars. They are the last gasp of the Alpha platform--which I have been told by people close to it, was meant to be a Pontiac "BMW 3-series". The bankruptcy killed Pontiac, but the Alpha had been mostly engineered, so it was "Cadillac-ized" with the new "edgy" CTS styling.Most Cadillacs sold are crossovers. The most profitable "Cadillac" is the Escalade (note that GM never jack up the name on THAT!).The question posed here is rather irrelevant. NO ONE has "a blank check", because GM (any company or corporation) does not have bottomless resources.Better styling, and superlative "performance" (by that, I mean being among the best in noise, harshness, handling, performance, reliablity, quality) would cost a lot of money.Post-bankruptcy GM actually tried. No one here mentioned GM's effort to do just that: the "Omega" platform, aka CT6.The (horribly misnamed) CT6 was actually a credible Mercedes/Lexus competitor. I'm sure it cost GM a fortune to develop (the platform was unique, not shared with any other car. The top-of-the-line ORIGINAL Blackwing V8 was also unique, expensive, and ultimately...very few were sold. All of this is a LOT of money).I used to know the sales numbers, and my sense was the CT6 sold about HALF the units GM projected. More importantly, it sold about half to two thirds the volume of the S-Class (which cost a lot more in 201x)Many of your fixed cost are predicated on volume. One way to improve your business case (if the right people want to get the Green Light) is to inflate your projected volumes. This lowers the unit cost for seats, mufflers, control arms, etc, and makes the vehicle more profitable--on paper.Suppliers tool up to make the number of parts the carmaker projects. However, if the volume is less than expected, the automaker has to make up the difference.So, unfortunately, not only was the CT6 an expensive car to build, but Cadillac's weak "brand equity" limited how much GM could charge (and these were still pricey cars in 2016-18, a "base" car was ).Other than the name, the "Omega" could have marked the starting point for Cadillac to once again be the standard of the world. Other than the awful name (Fleetwood, Elegante, Paramount, even ParAMOUR would be better), and offering the basest car with a FOUR cylinder turbo on the base car (incredibly moronic!), it was very good car and a CREDIBLE Mercedes S-Class/Lexus LS400 alternative. While I cannot know if the novel aluminum body was worth the cost (very expensive and complex to build), the bragging rights were legit--a LARGE car that was lighter, but had good body rigidity. No surprise, the interior was not the best, but the gap with the big boys was as close as GM has done in the luxury sphere.Mary Barra decided that profits today and tomorrow were more important than gambling on profits in 2025 and later. Having sunk a TON of money, and even done a mid-cycle enhancement, complete with the new Blackwing engine (which copied BMW with the twin turbos nestled in the "V"!), in fall 2018 GM announced it was discontinuing the car, and closing the assembly plant it was built in. (And so you know, building different platforms on the same line is very challenging and considerably less efficient in terms of capital and labor costs than the same platform, or better yet, the same model).So now, GM is anticipating that, as the car market "goes electric" (if you can call it that--more like the Federal Government and EU and even China PUSHING electric cars), they can make electric Cadillacs that are "prestige". The Cadillac Celestique is the opening salvo--$340,000. We will see how it works out.
Lynn Joiner Lynn JoinerJust put 2,000 miles on a Chevy Malibu rental from Budget, touring around AZ, UT, CO for a month. Ran fine, no problems at all, little 1.7L 4-cylinder just sipped fuel, and the trunk held our large suitcases easily. Yeah, I hated looking up at all the huge FWD trucks blowing by, but the Malibu easily kept up on the 80 mph Interstate in Utah. I expect a new one would be about a third the cost of the big guys. It won't tow your horse trailer, but it'll get you to the store. Why kill it?
Lynn Joiner Just put 2,000 miles on a Chevy Malibu rental from Budget, touring around AZ, UT, CO for a month. Ran fine, no problems at all, little 1.7L 4-cylinder just sipped fuel, and the trunk held our large suitcases easily. Yeah, I hated looking up at all the huge FWD trucks blowing by, but the Malibu easily kept up on the 80 mph Interstate in Utah. I expect a new one would be about a third the cost of the big guys. It won't tow your horse trailer, but it'll get you to the store. Why kill it?
Ollicat I am only speaking from my own perspective so no need to bash me if you disagree. I already know half or more of you will disagree with me. But I think the traditional upscale Cadillac buyer has traditionally been more conservative in their political position. My suggestion is to make Cadillac separate from GM and make them into a COMPANY, not just cars. And made the company different from all other car companies by promoting conservative causes and messaging. They need to build up a whole aura about the company and appeal to a large group of people that are really kind of sick of the left and sending their money that direction. But yes, I also agree about many of your suggestions above about the cars too. No EVs. But at this point, what has Cadillac got to lose by separating from GM completely and appealing to people with money who want to show everyone that they aren't buying the leftist Kook-Aid.
Jkross22 Cadillac's brand is damaged for the mass market. Why would someone pay top dollar for what they know is a tarted up Chevy? That's how non-car people see this.