Rare Rides: Extended Luxury With the 1986 Zimmer Quicksilver

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

Have you ever wished for a very luxurious coupe for grand touring purposes — one with an unconventional engine placement and the underpinnings of an economy car?

Well, we’ve got a car for you: the 1988 Zimmer Quicksilver.

First, the brand. Zimmer was founded in 1978 as a coachwork company in Syracuse, New York. The company’s mission was simple: Use existing production cars as a foundation upon which to implement neoclassical styling. Founder Paul Zimmer came up with the idea for a specialized company to produce elaborately rococo rides, and looped in his son Paul to run the business.

The company’s initial offering was the Golden Spirit, which entered production in 1978. Ford provided Mustangs as the base vehicle, and Zimmer stretched the wheelbase, added extensive fiberglass bodywork, and replaced the stock Ford interior with a much more luxurious one. The styling was intended to look roughly like a pre-War Mercedes-Benz coupe. In the fashionable late Seventies, the Golden Spirit was a success.

Continuing on into the Eighties, Zimmer grew its business to employ around 175 people at its peak. Seeking a second model offering, the company wanted to step away from approximations of past vehicles and make an elegant coupe of a new design. The new Pontiac Fiero seemed like a good basis for such a coupe for several reasons, and thus the Quicksilver was born. In 1984, new Fieros of 2.8-liter V6 and three-speed automatic specification were sent from Pontiac Assembly to the Zimmer manufacturing facility, appropriately located in Florida. From there, a transformation occurred.

The first thing removed from the Fiero were its body panels, which were all plastic and bolted very simply to the frame. To get the proportions spot-on for a luxury coupe, the Fiero’s wheelbase was stretched by 16 inches, with an overall length increase of 28 inches. The long, sweeping body of the Quicksilver was fiberglass, and its lines concealed the underlying Fiero-ness fairly well. You might even recognize the corner markers from a contemporary Corvette. Front grille inserts were custom, and cast iron.

Zimmer stripped down the Fiero’s economy car interior, replacing cheap plastic panels with real wood ones. The upholstery was always leather, and sourced from Italy. Special attention was paid to finishes, build quality, fitment of parts and trim, and covering surfaces in shag carpeting. This was a luxury car, after all. Improvements arising from the vehicle’s additional length included a glovebox (not found on Fiero) and a much larger trunk — both cargo areas being necessary for grand tours. Assorted interior handles, pulls, and lights were borrowed from Cadillac.

Zimmer didn’t spend any time altering the engine or transmission from stock Fiero status. Given it was a vehicle for longer-distance jaunts, Zimmer overlooked a fuel tank rework: The tiny eight-gallon tank from the Fiero carried over here, and meant a seriously short cruising range. At least the steering was considered, as a rack-and-pinion setup replaced GM’s simpler recirculating ball system.

Proud of its Quicksilver, Zimmer felt the care and design warranted a slight increase in cost. While the Fiero cost around $12,000 at the time, the Quicksilver was a bit more dear: $48,000 ($113,000 adjusted). The Quicksilver found customers even given its asking price, and continued in production through the end of the Fiero’s run in 1988.

Zimmer found itself under new ownership by the mid-Nineties, renamed to Art Zimmer Neo-Classic Motor Car company in 1997. Now headquartered in New York, AZNCMC builds up to 20 cars each year, split between custom Mustangs and custom Chevrolet Silverados.

Today’s Rare Ride is in excellent condition, in stunning white over boudoir. The dealer invites you to make an offer.

[Images: seller]

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 46 comments
  • Pwrwrench Pwrwrench on Apr 09, 2020

    I have an acquaintance that worked at the Clenet factories. He told me that, after some of the changes, it was a tense situation not knowing if he'd have a job the next day.

  • JimC2 JimC2 on Apr 10, 2020

    Wow... how garish! It's almost a caricature of a car, for some reason it makes me think of some of the fictitious cars from the Grand Theft Auto video game series. I can see how these would turn heads and I can also see how there would be a niche market of customers who'd pay a crap ton of money to own one. (Not for me but to each their own.) What a really neat car!

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I don't understand ... red texas residents hates earth saving hippy electric cars ... did a invasion of democrats occur ??
  • Macca I'm a bit disappointed in the CX-90, albeit from a brief test drive a couple weeks ago. We'll be buying a three-row SUV this summer and the CX-90 had been my top pick based on the initial reveal. Our local dealer didn't have any S Premium/Plus on the lot to drive so they stuck us in a mid-level PHEV. Once I got in and oriented myself to the gauges I noticed that the battery was depleted. I was shocked at the unrefined nature of the 2.5L I4 - it was quite loud, louder than I've experienced in a newer vehicle. It was thrashy and also didn't seem to rev smoothly. Even my former 1st-gen Mazda3 GT (2.3L) was more refined with regard to under-hood noises emanating into the cabin and NVH in general. In essentially ICE-only mode, it was only adequate when it came to acceleration, which isn't surprising. More road noise intrusion than I would like also seems to be a persistent Mazda trait despite recurring claims of addressing noise levels. Agree that the shifter 'innovation' here from Mazda is just silly and doesn't improve functionality. The super-shallow aspect ratio to the nav screen is an odd choice and not terribly pleasing.I can partially understand the choice to package the CX-70/90 in this manner, but it would seem neither model quite lives up to the aspirational pricing. Instead it feels like the price premium serves to help a small automaker stay solvent. Even more distressing is that the forum research I've done so far for the CX-90 is that it isn't quite fully baked and has some significant issues for many early adopters. I know owner's forums aren't the gospel for reliability, but some of the CX-90 horror stories I read were only outdone by true lemons like the Grand Cherokee/Wagoneer debacle. I am a Mazda fan and would gladly help support the brand if the product was dialed in, but this one fell short of expectations and fell a couple slots on our list.
  • MaintenanceCosts Tim, are you saying that the PHEV with the four is smoother with the engine running than the gas-only version with the six? If so, that's just baffling. I really should go test drive them both.Anecdotal "walking along the street" experience says that the CX-30, CX-5, and CX-50 are all taking this area by storm, but I don't see as many CX-90s. Seems like that segment is dominated around here by (Grand) Highlanders, Pilots, and Telluride/Palisades.
  • Bd2 Hyundai is, of course, not on this list as a forefront leader in ethics and accountability. Meanwhile the egg is in Toyota's face yet again.
  • Jkross22 This is likely my final chime in/experience with our leased CX9 as the lease is up in less than a month. We're getting 19.5- 20.0 mpg combined over the last few months. That's with the legacy 2.5T with the 6 speed auto. Not great but it is a responsive drive train and there's a fuel penalty for that I suppose. If you're thinking about picking up a used CX9, Mazda settled a lawsuit that extends the warranty of the 2.5T for another 2 years/24k miles. Double check to make sure the 2.5T model you're looking at is covered by this. This had to do with an oil consumption issue. We did test drive the CX90 with the inline 6. It was nice, but not what I was expecting in terms of sound and smoothness. As others have said, it ain't no BMW inline 6. Power was ok, but oddly not as responsive as the 2.5T. Maybe they'll get that sorted in the next couple of years. The improved mpg has to be due to the hybrid system and shutting off at stops. Lastly, Mazda's lease return process is terrible. They're good at reminding us the end is nigh, but they outsourced the inspection process to AutoVin. AutoVin noted a scratch that AutoVin said is normal wear and tear, but Mazda says (in their lease end paperwork) exceeds normal wear and tear. I took it to the nearest dealer and the manager there claimed to have no say in the return process and was unable/unwilling to assist.I called the leasing dealer and they said they couldn't help either. I called Mazda Finance and they said they would send AutoVin out again for a 2nd look, and no one has followed up to do this. In fact, it's extraordinarily difficult to get anyone at Mazda Finance to answer a call. Abysmal customer support all around. I would not lease a vehicle from Mazda again.Mazda says that they can send a final bill to us within 60 days if they determine there is anything beyond normal wear and tear. I guess I'll repair the scratch, but customers shouldn't be left guessing or getting conflicting information from the inspection company and the manufacturer. And neutering your dealers in this process is counterproductive and foolish.
Next