Rare Rides: A 1990 Subaru Legacy Wagon, Sold Back to Subaru

by Corey Lewis

Published: January 19th, 2021

rare rides a 1990 subaru legacy wagon sold back to subaru

Today’s Rare Ride is an example of utmost care and maintenance. It’s a 31-year-old wagon which was driven and kept in showroom condition over more than 200,000 miles.

This particular wagon was unique enough that Subaru purchased it for their collection.

At the end of the Eighties, Subaru started to revise the way it approached car design. Not content with a small slice of the pie at the quirky end of the car market, the company knew it would need more mainstream appeal to generate some mainstream sales. In North America, Subaru’s largest car on offer through the Eighties was the compact GL, which over time changed its name to Leone, and eventually Loyale.

Though still on the compact side, the new Legacy was larger than the Loyale, much more modern looking, and more suited to American tastes. It entered production in 1989 and debuted in North America for model-year 1990. Legacy was offered in sedan, and (more crucially to its customer base) wagon body styles. All first-generation Legacies were powered by four-cylinder power in boxer configuration. Displacement ranged from 1.8 to 2.2 liters, in naturally aspirated and turbocharged guises. Most North American examples were fitted with the naturally aspirated 2.2-liter, for adequate if not brisk forward movement. Transmissions on offer were a four-speed auto or five-speed manual.

Moving towards the middle in terms of design worked for Subaru. The Legacy established itself as more than a bit player, and offered all-wheel drive for consumers who didn’t want an agricultural Jeep, or couldn’t afford something like an Audi 5000 Quattro. The Legacy was a compact car for precisely one generation. In 1995 it moved on up to the midsize class where it could compete more directly with Camry and Accord, neither of which offered all-wheel drive. It continues in that mode to this day, albeit without a wagon variant.

In the Legacy’s first model year in North America, someone purchased today’s Rare Ride and began taking exceptional care of it. In late 2019 it was purchased by an enthusiast of Japanese and Nineties automobiles on a whim. The seller reports he was not looking for a Subaru, but was taken with the condition of this particular example and decided to grab it. There are many breathless paragraphs about this in the extensive ad linked below.

The Legacy needed a bit of work, namely on suspension bits which were old and tired, tires, and other things made of rubber. Its new owner set about restoring the questionable parts of the car to factory condition, and reports spending around $6,000 to get everything up to snuff.

Job done, it was time to part with the Subaru so it was put up on Craigslist in the San Francisco area for $6,800. The seller received one particular offering of interest, from the company that built the car. Subaru of America reached out to buy the Legacy, to add it to their private museum collection in New Jersey. They took it into their possession a couple of weeks ago, so this particular Legacy will be forever preserved.

[Images: Subaru]

#1990s #4x4 #AWD #CarMuseums #ClassicCars #CollectorCars #FamilyCars #Imports #Japan #NewsBlog #UsedCars #Subaru #SubaruLegacy #Sedans #Wagons #RareRides

Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments

Join the conversation

4 of 18 comments

Dave M. on Jan 19, 2021

Interesting in the ad Subaru compares with the "mid-size" Jag XJ6 and BMW 535 but "compact" 190 Merc, not the E class.

Like Reply
- See 1 previous
- Corey Lewis on Jan 19, 2021
  
  I think that's because the price jump from the 190E to 300E was ridiculous. IIRC 300E was priced more like XJ12 and 7 Series.
  
  Like
- Johnnyz on Jan 20, 2021
  
  @Corey Lewis That is what I noticed too. Hook me up with the BMW with the 3.5 inline six. You can keep the head gasket wheezing boxer 4.
  
  Like
Jmo on Jan 19, 2021

200k miles? The seats look like they have never been sat on.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Arthur Dailey Agree with @Jeff, if you needed a cheap vehicle that was relatively robust and last a long time and you did not care about driving dynamics you could do worse than a J-Car. They as the saying go, drove badly, for a long time. They were less rust prone than many Japanese imports, and either more reliable or more robust than many (most) European or Korean autos. And parts were cheap and repairs relatively simple. As he writes, we complain about the lack of inexpensive, basic autos but then criticize autos that were inexpensive and basic. As the saying goes 'you can get cheap, fast or good, but you cannot get all 3 in the same product'.
Bd2 Overpriced food, awful home furnishings, endless assortments of sugary candy and drinks which are mostly garbage and childish gimmicks galore. Indeed, the most "American" of traditions.
SCE to AUX Some pretty big strikes:[list][*]Drivetrain - how can a straight-6 be thrashy? Shame on you, Mazda.[/*][*]Poor fuel economy.[/*][*]Tire noise.[/*][*]Poor user interface.[/*][*]That colored dash is a bit garish for me.[/*][*]High price.[/*][*]Indistinct look in the Mazda lineup. Their SUVs are Russian nesting dolls.[/*][*]Nothing compelling to lure a buyer away from the bigger brands.[/*][/list]I don't see this moving the needle for Mazda in the US market.
Ash78 Dear unions, thank you for your service and for expressing interest in our automotive factories. Due to your many decades of pressuring employers to do better, the more adept companies have gotten your message and have implemented most of your demands preemptively in order to maintain a better employer-employee relationship than the manufacturing industry as a whole.We truly appreciate your feedback and interest, and all it has done to improve employer relations since the industrial revolution. We take your concerns seriously and will be glad to reach back out if our situation changes.We will keep your resume on file for three years, per company policy.Sincerely,Everyone
Theflyersfan I'm having a tough time figuring out Mazda's recent lineup decisions. I've mentioned before how having the CX-5 and CX-50 makes no sense as it seems like they would steal each other's sales instead of conquest sales from other brands. And now here comes the CX-70 vs 90 decision. If Mazda wanted to position the 70 above the 90 with pricing, I think they should have gone the Audi Q7 vs Q8 route. The Q8 costs more, has one fewer row, and is smaller on the inside, but has the more aggressive styling and tries to position itself as the sportier alternative large CUV in their lineup. With Mazda, the 70 and 90 seem to be in the position, like the 5 vs 50, to steal each other's sales. There isn't anything compelling me to get a 70 if I get more for my money with a 90, except 100,000 miles down the road, I won't have a folded up third row seat rattling around loosely. Mazda should have brought over the CX-60 and position that where they wanted the 70. I understand it's a touch larger than the X3, Q5, and GLC CUVs, which is a sweet spot in that market. Make the CX-70 a sportier alternative 2-row instead of such a blatant cynical move of just ripping a seat out of the 90, calling it an all new model and price it in the same ballpark. I want Mazda to succeed and continue to be independent, but decisions like these make me wonder what their future plans are.