Junkyard Find: 1984 Subaru GL Sedan

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

Prior to the 1980s, Subarus were known by Americans more for being tiny and cheap than anything else (though some car shoppers in snow-prone areas came to appreciate Subaru's optional four-wheel-drive system during that time), but then the bigger second-generation Leone went on sale here for the 1980 model year and Subaru became quite a bit more mainstream on our shores. Today's Junkyard Find is one of those second-gen cars, found in a Colorado self-service yard.

1984 was the last model year here for the second-generation Leone in sedan, coupe and wagon form; the US-market hatchback stayed on this chassis through 1989 and the BRAT pickup through 1987.

Subaru didn't use the Leone name in the United States, so all the (non-BRAT) Leone-based cars sold here were called "The Subaru" and badged according to trim level until the Loyale name appeared for the 1990 model year. The plastic under the faux-chrome emblems was bright yellow, so it looks bad when the coating peels off in the Colorado sun.

The GL was the top trim level in 1984, so this car is nicely equipped for its time.

You could get the four-door GL sedan with four-wheel-drive, but this one is a front-wheel-drive car with a five-speed manual transmission (the base and DL Subarus got a four-on-the-floor as standard equipment). If you wanted an automatic transmission, you paid an extra 301 bucks ($875 now).

The list price for a 1984 Subaru GL front-wheel-drive sedan with manual transmission was $7,237, or about $21,040 in 2022 dollars. The absolute cheapest Subaru that year was the base three-door hatchback, which started at $5,096 ($14,815 today).

The GL got a 73-horsepower 1.8-liter boxer four under the hood, while the DL and base Subarus had to get by with a 1.6-liter with 59 horses.

Curb weight was just 2,190 pounds for the GL sedan, meaning it was slow but not intolerably so.

A new AE82 Toyota Corolla sedan went for between $6,498 and $7,198 with five-speed manual transmission in 1984, while a Civic sedan cost $7,099. The Subaru DL and GL were right with them in specs and pricing, and you could pay a bit more and get four-wheel-drive.

This one has air conditioning and an AM/FM radio with separate cassette deck. Back in the early 1990s, I used this easy-to-extract Subaru sound-system setup in a couple of my hooptie cars at the time.

Just better than 150,000 miles on the clock.

These cars rusted enthusiastically, but they don't use much road salt along Colorado's Front Range so the rot on this one happened in slow motion.

Real-world resale value on a rusty 38-year-old Subaru with two-wheel-drive and a manual transmission must be hovering just around scrap value these days, so here it sits, awaiting the cold steel jaws of The Crusher.

The GL-10 was the top version of the Subaru GL.

Number-one-selling import in Maine and Vermont!

Poor abused Subarus.

You don't see many US-market ads for the Leone four-door. For that, we must go to Japan.

The Leone 4WD was a super sedan.


For links to more than 2,300 additional Junkyard Finds, be sure to visit the Junkyard Home of the Murilee Martin Lifestyle Brand™.

[Images: The author]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 8 comments
  • Conundrum Conundrum on Sep 13, 2022

    I started with an '88 Warthog turbo wagon, as an eight year old winter beater in 1997. Had air suspension, automatic, AWD, the lot and a fuzzy blue interior that was quite comfy. Not a bad old bus. Of course, prewarned by sniggering lads of the Cprescott variety, I checked inside my boxer shorts to see if Shorty was still there before signing the check. Two years later I got an Impreza TS which gave almost ten years service and less than $1k in unplanned repairs. Both exhibited Subaru's less than perfect fuel injection mapping, so occasional hiccups, dead bands in the midrange throttle response and mediocre mileage, but no other quirks. Todays Subarus are a dead zone to me, being perambulating ninny cars, but I look back on the dowdy-looking Warthog as an interesting drive.

  • Art Vandelay Art Vandelay on Sep 13, 2022

    This car is where it belongs!

  • SCE to AUX Some pretty big strikes:[list][*]Drivetrain - how can a straight-6 be thrashy? Shame on you, Mazda.[/*][*]Poor fuel economy.[/*][*]Tire noise.[/*][*]Poor user interface.[/*][*]That colored dash is a bit garish for me.[/*][*]High price.[/*][*]Indistinct look in the Mazda lineup. Their SUVs are Russian nesting dolls.[/*][*]Nothing compelling to lure a buyer away from the bigger brands.[/*][/list]I don't see this moving the needle for Mazda in the US market.
  • Ash78 Dear unions, thank you for your service and for expressing interest in our automotive factories. Due to your many decades of pressuring employers to do better, the more adept companies have gotten your message and have implemented most of your demands preemptively in order to maintain a better employer-employee relationship than the manufacturing industry as a whole.We truly appreciate your feedback and interest, and all it has done to improve employer relations since the industrial revolution. We take your concerns seriously and will be glad to reach back out if our situation changes.We will keep your resume on file for three years, per company policy.Sincerely,Everyone
  • Theflyersfan I'm having a tough time figuring out Mazda's recent lineup decisions. I've mentioned before how having the CX-5 and CX-50 makes no sense as it seems like they would steal each other's sales instead of conquest sales from other brands. And now here comes the CX-70 vs 90 decision. If Mazda wanted to position the 70 above the 90 with pricing, I think they should have gone the Audi Q7 vs Q8 route. The Q8 costs more, has one fewer row, and is smaller on the inside, but has the more aggressive styling and tries to position itself as the sportier alternative large CUV in their lineup. With Mazda, the 70 and 90 seem to be in the position, like the 5 vs 50, to steal each other's sales. There isn't anything compelling me to get a 70 if I get more for my money with a 90, except 100,000 miles down the road, I won't have a folded up third row seat rattling around loosely. Mazda should have brought over the CX-60 and position that where they wanted the 70. I understand it's a touch larger than the X3, Q5, and GLC CUVs, which is a sweet spot in that market. Make the CX-70 a sportier alternative 2-row instead of such a blatant cynical move of just ripping a seat out of the 90, calling it an all new model and price it in the same ballpark. I want Mazda to succeed and continue to be independent, but decisions like these make me wonder what their future plans are.
  • Daniel J This thing is just too big and not packaged great being RWD. I'd prefer a FWD/AWD pre 2024 Santa Fe sized vehicle. A true CX-70.
  • Ash78 Now that we're on the topic, I think Apple owes us all a ton of money for bringing out new phones every 1-2 years and devaluing the one I have! /sDepreciation has always been a part of car ownership, far more so now if you're getting into EVs. I think it's just the discrete nature of these depreciation events (ie, price cuts) that have everyone wringing their hands.I'm too price sensitive -- not necessarily to BUY an EV -- but for the fear of what a truly disruptive battery tech might do to them. Split the differene with a hybrid or PHEV and you've reduced your car's reliance on battery tech as the primary determinant of value.
Next