Rare Rides Icons: The Cadillac Eldorado, Distinctly Luxurious (Part XXII)

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

In our last installment of the Cadillac Eldorado saga, we covered the engineering and equipment advancements that arrived with the fourth generation in 1959. All Cadillacs grew longer, lower, and wider, and the exclusive Fleetwood Brougham moved closer to its Biarritz and Seville siblings. But the big news for 1959 was all-new styling courtesy of Bill Mitchell. As we’ve learned lately, even one-year-old styling was reasonable cause for criticism from the competition.

(Note: The red Cadillac pictured is the 1959 Eldorado Seville, and the white example is a 1958.)


The big and bold prow of the 1959 Eldorado Seville and Biarritz were more streamlined and modernized, keeping with Bill Mitchell’s efforts to undo the heavy chrome look cultivated by his predecessor Harley Earl. Quad headlamps appeared as expected, still a hot new lighting fixture in the United States. The lamps were spread apart more than previously, in an effort to cover the wider real estate available.

Above the lamps were fender awnings that extended further than before, and formed an eyebrow look across the front end. The awnings blended inward to the hood line, its opening concealed much more effectively than in 1958. Presented on a less vertical surface was the Cadillac crest and V emblem, both of which were simplified and widened for 1959.

The grille wore a refined egg crate theme that continued from the prior year, with bullet casing type details at each intersection of the grille vanes. New was a thick chrome bar that bisected the grille and created two equally sized sections. The bar wrapped around under the headlamps and terminated at either side at the wheel well. Dagmars were no more, the time for them had passed as they were an Earl hallmark. 

Bumpers were simplified and lightened in 1959, as rib detailing went by the wayside along with some of the vertical surface area. The front bumper wrapped around and under the front of the Eldorado, and presented fog lights and turning indicators in separate circular and ovoid pods. Viewed as a single element, the pods look a bit awkward. Between them was the recessed chrome license plate surround. 

At the front corner there was a notable removal of any vent detailing, and the height of the fender itself was lowered for less surface area. The mainstay chrome strake that extended from the headlamp into the door in 1958 was gone in 1959. Its replacement was a body character line in a similar position that faded to nothing ahead of the front door.

Also more restrained were the wheel well openings: Where the 1958 Earl design saw the front wheel well extended toward the rear, the 1959 Eldorado’s wheel arch tucked downward much closer to the front tire. At the bottom of the arch above the chrome body molding was block ELDORADO lettering; there was no body side script to be found. Other notable body chrome was found just below the window line and extended beneath the rear fins. Side strakes of any kind were removed, and rear wheels were once again skirted like they were in 1954. 

The windshield was still the wraparound style Cadillac pioneered in the first Eldorado in 1953, but wrapped around slightly less than it did in 1958. In its place was a new A-pillar shape that curved rearward at the top edge of the door instead of 1958’s 90-degree angle. Thick chrome surrounded window openings and the windshield as before, but the roofline took a more streamlined shape in 1959. No longer was there a rearward canted B-pillar, but rather one which angled forward in a natural way to the roof. Rear-side windows were much larger than before, and created a much lighter looking greenhouse with more glass area. 

The rear windshield was enlarged considerably, and took a more modern shape with minimal wraparound toward the B-pillar. Rear passengers were treated to much more light than in 1958, as the ‘59’s rear window extended above their heads. If those passengers looked behind them, they’d see the enormous new fins the Eldorado sported. 


Larger than ever before, the rear fins were a “take that” to Chrysler and Imperial. They extended off the fender looking sharp and encased in pointed chrome. Bullet-shaped quad brake lamps were placed in the middle of the fins, each with their own thick chrome surrounds and trim spear. Chrome along the body line extended under the fins and toward the rocket-inspired rear pods, which contained large reversing lamps.

The lamps were much smaller than they were in 1958, and wore new V detailing instead of the matching grille egg crate of 1958. An extended trunk lid sloped longer and further than ever before, and wore no badging at all. The only indication of branding at the rear was ELDORADO block lettering on a chrome trim strip between the trunk lid and bumper. 

The bumper wore new detailing to match the grille, surrounded by two thick bands of chrome. It also extended the full width of the rear, a different approach to the corner covering style seen in the prior generation. Overall there was more fender and less bumper at the rear, and the chromed shape looked more a part of the design rather than attached as afterthought.

Unfortunately, there was no special wheel design for the 1959 Eldorado. Thick whitewalls surrounded a turbine style wheel cover, though more traditional chrome wires were also available (optioned here). Both the wire wheels and turbine wheel disc were shared with other Cadillac models that year, with only two differentiations: Standard Series 62 and DeVille models had a flatter turbine design with more vanes, while Sixty Special, Seventy-Five, Eldorado, and Eldorado Brougham shared a taller turbine look with fewer vanes.

In our next installment we’ll take a look at the design of the exclusive Eldorado Brougham. Its hand-built Italian body was an oddity in the domestic automotive landscape at the time, and would be a one-off sort of experiment. And unlike the prior Eldorado Brougham, the ‘59 was a preview of future styling rather than a pastiche of the past. Until next time.


Images: [ dealer, dealer, GM]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by    subscribing to our newsletter.

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 16 comments
  • Arthur Dailey Arthur Dailey on Apr 22, 2024

    That red '59 is gorgeous. The front view, the side view and in particular the back end treatment is far superior to that of the '58's. Although I do appreciate the front end of the '58.


    Although I have driven a '59 Caddy convertible, it was very sedately and all too briefly. So I was not concerned about or taking time to notice body flex. Hopefully in a future column Corey could address that?


    Regardless Corey's columns are in my opinion the best things of this site. Not like some clickbait articles we see here. Should we all post multiple comments and check Corey's columns multiple times to demonstrate that we prefer Corey's type of column/articles?

    • See 2 previous
    • Jeff Jeff on Apr 22, 2024

      I concur with Corey's columns being the best on this site. I would like to add Murilee Martin as well. I would have liked more on the Crosley but I understand that Corey is limited to just one post a week. Too bad because even Corey's car reviews were excellent.


  • Marty S Marty S on Apr 23, 2024

    I learned to drive on a Crosley. Also, I had a brand new 75 Buick Riviera and the doors were huge. Bent the inside edge of the hood when opening it while the passenger door was open. Pretty poor assembly quality.

    • Jeff Jeff on Apr 23, 2024

      The doors on the early to mid 70s gm cars were big and heavy. When opening the doors you had to be careful not to dent the door of the car you were parked next to. My 77 Monte had aluminum door edge guards but the shear weight of the doors could do serious damage. Had to replace the pins on the door hinges after the doors started to sag.


  • Bd2 Lexus is just a higher trim package Toyota. ^^
  • Tassos ONLY consider CIvics or Corollas, in their segment. NO DAMNED Hyundais, Kias, Nissans or esp Mitsus. Not even a Pretend-BMW Mazda. They may look cute but they SUCK.I always recommend Corollas to friends of mine who are not auto enthusiasts, even tho I never owed one, and owned a Civic Hatch 5 speed 1992 for 25 years. MANY follow my advice and are VERY happy. ALmost all are women.friends who believe they are auto enthusiasts would not listen to me anyway, and would never buy a Toyota. They are damned fools, on both counts.
  • Tassos since Oct 2016 I drive a 2007 E320 Bluetec and since April 2017 also a 2008 E320 Bluetec.Now I am in my summer palace deep in the Eurozone until end October and drive the 2008.Changing the considerable oils (10 quarts synthetic) twice cost me 80 and 70 euros. Same changes in the US on the 2007 cost me $219 at the dealers and $120 at Firestone.Changing the air filter cost 30 Euros, with labor, and there are two such filters (engine and cabin), and changing the fuel filter only 50 euros, while in the US they asked for... $400. You can safely bet I declined and told them what to do with their gold-plated filter. And when I changed it in Europe, I looked at the old one and it was clean as a whistle.A set of Continentals tires, installed etc, 300 EurosI can't remember anything else for the 2008. For the 2007, a brand new set of manual rec'd tires at Discount Tire with free rotations for life used up the $500 allowance the dealer gave me when I bought it (tires only had 5000 miles left on them then)So, as you can see, I spent less than even if I owned a Lexus instead, and probably less than all these poor devils here that brag about their alleged low cost Datsun-Mitsus and Hyundai-Kias.And that's THETRUTHABOUTCARS. My Cars,
  • NJRide These are the Q1 Luxury division salesAudi 44,226Acura 30,373BMW 84,475Genesis 14,777Mercedes 66,000Lexus 78,471Infiniti 13,904Volvo 30,000*Tesla (maybe not luxury but relevant): 125,000?Lincoln 24,894Cadillac 35,451So Cadillac is now stuck as a second-tier player with names like Volvo. Even German 3rd wheel Audi is outselling them. Where to gain sales?Surprisingly a decline of Tesla could boost Cadillac EVs. Tesla sort of is now in the old Buick-Mercury upper middle of the market. If lets say the market stays the same, but another 15-20% leave Tesla I could see some going for a Caddy EV or hybrid, but is the division ready to meet them?In terms of the mainstream luxury brands, Lexus is probably a better benchmark than BMW. Lexus is basically doing a modern interpretation of what Cadillac/upscale Olds/Buick used to completely dominate. But Lexus' only downfall is the lack of emotion, something Cadillac at least used to be good at. The Escalade still has far more styling and brand ID than most of Lexus. So match Lexus' quality but out-do them on comfort and styling. Yes a lot of Lexus buyers may be Toyota or import loyal but there are a lot who are former GM buyers who would "come home" for a better product.In fact, that by and large is the Big 3's problem. In the 80s and 90s they would try to win back "import intenders" and this at least slowed the market share erosion. I feel like around 2000 they gave this up and resorted to a ton of gimmicks before the bankruptcies. So they have dropped from 66% to 37% of the market in a quarter century. Sure they have scaled down their presence and for the last 14 years preserved profit. But in the largest, most prosperous market in the world they are not leading. I mean who would think the Koreans could take almost 10% of the market? But they did because they built and structured products people wanted. (I also think the excess reliance on overseas assembly by the Big 3 hurts them vs more import brands building in US). But the domestics should really be at 60% of their home market and the fact that they are not speaks volumes. Cadillac should not be losing 2-1 to Lexus and BMW.
  • Tassos Not my favorite Eldorados. Too much cowbell (fins), the gauges look poor for such an expensive car, the interior has too many shiny bits but does not scream "flagship luxury", and the white on red leather or whatever is rather loud for this car, while it might work in a Corvette. But do not despair, a couple more years and the exterior designs (at least) will sober up, the cowbells will be more discreet and the long, low and wide 60s designs are not far away. If only the interiors would be fit for the price point, and especially a few acres of real wood that also looked real.
Next